Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-32 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Procedures

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
5-32
August 8, 2005
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2005–47, page 261.
ATM surcharge fees.This ruling holds that, for federal
income tax purposes, a credit card issuer treats third-party
ATM surcharge fees incurred by its cardholders as additional
amounts loaned to those cardholders. Further, this is so
whether the credit card issuer reflects the ATM surcharge
fee on the cardholder’s account as part of the amount of
the cardholder’s cash advance (as in Situation 1) or as a
separately stated amount (as in Situation 2).
Rev. Rul.
2005–48, page 259.
Restrict
ed property received for services; securities law.
This ruli
ng clarifies that, except as otherwise provided by sec-
tion 83 of
the Code, transfer restrictions on restricted stock
or other s
ection 83 property do not prevent the property from
being su
bstantially vested for purposes of section 83.
Notice 2005–53, page 263.
This notice provides supplemental guidance for foreign banks
concerning interest expense allocation. The notice also indi-
cates that the Treasury Department and the IRS are evaluat-
ing foreign banking industry data to determine whether the
93-percent fixed ratio in step 2 of the interest expense allo-
cation formula under regulations section 1.882–5 should be
increased, and whether the fair market value election for valu-
ing U.S. assets should require the use of the actual ratio in step
2. The notice also permits taxpayers who use the adjusted
U.S. book liability method to calculate excess interest by ref-
erence to a published LIBOR rate rather than the taxpayer’s
actual non-U.S.-based dollar borrowing rate.
Notice 2005–55, page 265.
2005 marginal production rates.This notice announces
the applicable percentage under section 613A of the Code to
be used in determining percentage depletion for marginal prop-
erties for the 2005 calendar year.
Notice 2005–56, page 266.
2005 enhanced oil recovery credit.The enhanced oil re-
covery credit for taxable years beginning in the 2005 calendar
year is determined without regard to the phase-out for crude
oil price increases provided in section 43(b) of the Code.
Notice 2005–57, page 267.
Tobacco quota termination payments.This notice provides
guidance in a Q&A format regarding the tax treatment of pay-
ments made to eligible tobacco quota holders for the termi-
nation of tobacco marketing quotas and related price support
programs under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. No-
tice 2005–51 modified and superseded.
Rev. Proc. 2005–47, page 269.
This procedure provides automatic consent procedures for cer-
tain taxpayers to change their method of accounting for credit
cardcashadvancefeestotreatthesefeesascreatingorin-
creasing OID on a pool of credit card loans that includes the
cash advances that give rise to these fees. The procedure
also sets forth the conditions under which the Commissioner
will not challenge a taxpayer’s treatment of such fees. Rev.
Proc. 2002–9 modified and amplified.
(Continued on the next page)
Announcements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 275.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Announcement 2005–54, page 283.
American Islamic College, Inc., of Chicago, IL; Athena Sports of
Arvada, CO; National Consumer Council, Inc., of Las Vegas, NV;
National Consumer Council, Inc., of Los Angeles, CA; Northern
Services Group, Inc., of Monsey, NY; Project Homestead, Inc.,
of High Point, NC; and University of Baltimore Athletic Founda-
tion, Inc., of Baltimore, MD, no longer qualify as organizations
to which contributions are deductible under section 170 of the
Code.
EXCISE TAX
Announcement 2005–51, page 283.
The Service will not assert the penalty under section 6715
of the Code with respect to dyed diesel fuel that is sold for
use or used for highway use in Florida counties west of the
Apalachicola River during the period July 8, 2005, through July
18, 2005.
TAX CONVENT
IONS
Notice 200
5–53, page 263.
This notic
e provides supplemental guidance for foreign banks
concernin
g interest expense allocation. The notice also indi-
cates that
the Treasury Department and the IRS are evaluat-
ing foreig
n banking industry data to determine whether the
93-percen
t fixed ratio in step 2 of the interest expense allo-
cation fo
rmula under regulations section 1.882–5 should be
increase
d, and whether the fair market value election for valu-
ing U.S. a
ssets should require the use of the actual ratio in step
2. The not
ice also permits taxpayers who use the adjusted
U.S. book
liability method to calculate excess interest by ref-
erence t
o a published LIBOR rate rather than the taxpayer’s
actual n
on-U.S.-based dollar borrowing rate.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Notice 2005–53, page 263.
This notice provides supplemental guidance for foreign banks
concerning interest expense allocation. The notice also indi-
cates that the Treasury Department and the IRS are evaluat-
ing foreign banking industry data to determine whether the
93-percent fixed ratio in step 2 of the interest expense allo-
cation formula under regulations section 1.882–5 should be
increased, and whether the fair market value election for valu-
ing U.S. assets should require the use of the actual ratio in step
2. The notice also permits taxpayers who use the adjusted
U.S. book liability method to calculate excess interest by ref-
erence to a published LIBOR rate rather than the taxpayer’s
actual non-U.S.-based dollar borrowing rate.
Rev. Proc. 2005–48, page 271.
This procedure provides the maximum vehicle values using the
special valuation rules under sections 1.61–21(d) and (e) of the
regulations. These values are indexed for inflation and must
be adjusted annually by referring to the Consumer Price Index
(CPI).
Rev. Proc. 2005–50, page 272.
This procedure prescribes how an eligible educational institu-
tion may obtain automatic consent from the Service to change
its method of reporting under section 6050S of the Code and
section 1.6050S–1 of the regulations. For calendar years be-
ginning after December 31, 2003, an eligible educational in-
stitution must elect to report either the aggregate amount of
payments received, or the aggregate amount billed, for qual-
ified expenses during the calendar year for students enrolled
for any academic period. Section 1.6050S–1(b)(1) provides
that once an eligible educational institution elects to report ei-
ther amounts billed, or payments received, it must continue to
use the same method of reporting for all subsequent calendar
years for which it is required to file information returns, and fur-
nish information statements, unless permission is granted to
change its reporting method. An eligible educational institution
that complies with all of the conditions and procedures of this
revenue procedure has obtained consent to change its method
of reporting as required by section 1.6050S–1(b)(1).
August 8, 20052005–32 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2005–32 I.R.B.August 8, 2005

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 83.—Property
Transferred in Connection
With Performance of
Services
26 CFR 1.83–3: Meaning and use of certain terms —
substantially vested.
Restricted p
roperty received for ser-
vices; secu
rities law.This ruling clarifies
that, excep
t as otherwise provided by sec-
tion 83 of th
e Code, transfer restrictions on
restricted
stock or other section 83 prop-
erty do not
prevent the property from being
substanti
ally vested for purposes of section
83.
Rev. Rul. 2005–48
ISSUE
If an employee exercises a nonstatutory
option more than six months after grant,
but is subject to restrictions on his abil-
ity to sell the stock obtained through ex-
ercise of the option under rule 10b–5 un-
der the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the contractual provisions described
below, is the employee required to recog-
nize income under section 83 of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code at the time of the exer-
cise of the option?
FACTS
On January 2, 2005, Employee E, an
employee of Company M, is granted a non-
statutory option to purchase M common
stock. Although the option is immediately
exercisable, it has no readily ascertainable
fair market value when it is granted. Un-
der the option, Employee E has the right to
purchase 100 shares of M stock for $10 per
share, which is the fair market value of an
M share on the date of grant of the option.
On May 1, 2005, M sells its common
stock in an initial public offering. As re-
quired under the Underwriting Agreement,
Employee E agrees not to sell, otherwise
dispose of, or hedge any common shares,
options, warrants, or convertible securities
of M from May 1 through November 1 of
2005 (“the lock-up period”).
Also on May 1, 2005, M adopts an In-
sider Trading Compliance Program, under
which, as applied to 2005, insiders (such
as Employee E) may trade M shares only
between November 5 and November 30
of that year (“the trading window”). Un-
der the Program, if Employee E trades M
shares outside the trading window with-
out M’s permission, M has the right to ter-
minate Employee E’s employment. How-
ever, the exercise ofnonstatutory options
for M shares is not prohibited under the
referenced agreements.
On August 15, 2005 (during the lock-up
period and outside the trading window), M
stock is trading on an established securi-
ties market at more than $10 per share. On
that date, Employee E fully exercises the
option, paying the exercise price in cash,
and receives 100 M shares. Employee E’s
rights in the shares received as a result of
the exercise are not conditioned upon the
future performance of substantial services.
As of that date, Employee E is in the pos-
session of material nonpublic information
concerning M that would subject him to li-
ability under Rule 10b–5 under the Secu-
rities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange
Act”), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b–5, if Employee
E sold the M shares while in possession of
such information.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 83(a) provides that if, in con-
nection with the performance of services,
property is transferred to any person other
than the person for whom such services
are performed, the excess of the fair mar-
ket value of the property at the first time
that the rights to the property are either
transferable or not subject to a substantial
risk of forfeiture (“substantially vested”),
whichever occurs earlier, over the amount
paid for the property is included in the
gross income of the service provider in the
first taxable year in which the rights to the
property are substantially vested.
For purposes of section 83, a “transfer”
of property occurs when a person acquires
a beneficial ownership interest in the prop-
erty (disregarding any “lapse restriction”).
See section 1.83–3(a)(1) of the Income Tax
Regulations.
Under section 1.83–3(h), a restriction
which, by its terms, will never lapse (also
referred to as a “nonlapse restriction”) is a
permanent limitation on the transferability
of property that will require the transferee
of the property to sell (or offer to sell) the
property at a price determined under a for-
mula and that will continue to apply and be
enforced against the transferee or any sub-
sequent holder (other than the transferor).
An obligation to resell (or to offer to sell)
the transferred property to a specific per-
son or persons at its fair market value at
the time of the sale is not a nonlapse re-
striction.
The term “lapse restriction” means a re-
striction other than a nonlapse restriction
and includes (but is not limited to) a re-
striction that carries a substantial risk of
forfeiture. See section 1.83–3(i).
For purposes of section 83, property
is substantially nonvested when it is both
subject to a “substantial risk of forfei-
ture” and is “nontransferable” within the
meaning of sections 1.83–3(c) and (d), re-
spectively. Property is substantially vested
when it is either transferable or not subject
to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
Whether a risk of forfeiture is substan-
tial (or not) depends upon the facts and cir-
cumstances. A substantial risk of forfei-
ture exists where rights in property that are
transferred are conditioned, directly or in-
directly, upon the future performance (or
refraining from performance) of substan-
tial services by any person or the occur-
rence of a condition related to the purpose
of the transfer, and the possibility of for-
feiture is substantial if such condition is
not satisfied. Property is not subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture to the extent
that the employer is required to pay the fair
market value of a portion of the property to
the employee upon the return of the prop-
erty. The risk that the value of property
will decline during a certain period of time
does not constitute a substantial risk of for-
feiture. A nonlapse restriction, standing by
itself, is not a substantial risk of forfeiture.
See section 1.83–3(c)(1).
For purposes of section 83, the rights
of a person in property are “transferable”
if the person can transfer any interest in
the property to any person other than the
transferor of the property, but only if the
transferee’s rights in the property are not
2005–32 I.R.B.259August 8, 2005

subject to a substantialrisk of forfeiture.
Accordingly, property is transferable if the
person performing the services or receiv-
ing the property can sell, assign, or pledge
(as collateral for a loan, or as security for
the performance of anobligation, or for
any other purpose) his interest in the prop-
erty to any person other than the trans-
feror of the property, and if the transferee
is not required to give up the property or
its value in the event that the substantial
risk of forfeiture materializes. See section
1.83–3(d).
Section 83(e)(3) provides that section
83(a) does not apply to the transfer of an
option without a readily ascertainable fair
market value. However, section 83(a) does
applytosuchanoptionatthetimethatitis
exercised, sold, or otherwise disposed of.
If the option is exercised, section 83(a) ap-
plies to the transfer of property pursuant to
the exercise. If the option is sold or other-
wise disposed of in an arm’s length trans-
action, section 83(a) applies to the transfer
of money or other property received in the
same manner as it would have applied to
the transfer of property pursuant to an ex-
ercise of the option. See section 1.83–7(a)
of the regulations.
Under section 83(c)(3) of the Code
and section 1.83–3(j) of the regulations, if
thesaleofpropertyataprofitwithinsix
months after the purchase of the property
could subject a person to suit under sec-
tion 16(b) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 78p(b), the person’s rights in the prop-
erty are treated as subject to a substantial
risk of forfeiture, and as not transferable,
until the earlier of (1) the expiration of
such six-month period, or (2) the first
day on which the sale of the property at
a profit will not subject the person to suit
under section 16(b). Because, when en-
acting section 83(c)(3), Congress decided
that the only provision of the securities
law that would delay taxation under that
section would be section 16(b), potential
liability for insider trading under Rule
10b–5, for example, does not cause rights
in property taxable under section 83 to be
substantially nonvested.
Section 16(b) liability is triggered by
either a “purchase and sale” or a “sale
and purchase” of a security registered
under section 12 of the Exchange Act,
15 U.S.C. § 78l, within a period of less
than six months by an officer, director, or
greater-than-10-percent owner of the cor-
poration that issued the security. 15 U.S.C.
§§ 78p(a) and (b). The combination of a
purchase and a sale event (in either order)
within a six-month period is what triggers
section 16(b) liability.
Before May 1, 1991, the acquisition of
stock as the result of the exercise of an op-
tion was viewed as a “purchase” for sec-
tion 16(b) purposes. Thus, the six-month
period under section 16(b) was measured
from the date an option was exercised.
However, effective May 1, 1991, the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) adopted new rules under section
16; thereafter, for purposes of that section,
derivative securities, including options,
generally were treated as the functional
equivalents of stock ownership. Own-
ership Reports and Trading by Officers,
Directors and Principal Security Hold-
ers, SEC Release No. 34–28869, 56 Fed.
Reg. 7242, 7248 (Feb. 21, 1991). Stated
another way, the SEC recognized “that
holding derivative securities is function-
ally equivalent to holding the underlying
equity securities for purposes of Section
16, since the value of the derivative se-
curities is a function of or related to the
value of the underlying equity security.”
Id. Accordingly, the SEC determined that
the acquisition of an option should be
deemed the significant event for purposes
of section 16(b), not the exercise.Id.
In implementing this change, the SEC
provided that any acquisition or dispo-
sition of an option involves either a
“purchase” or “sale” for section 16(b)
purposes. 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.16b–6(a),
240.16a–1(c), and 240.16a–1(b). The SEC
exempted from section 16(b) exercises and
conversions of options that (like Employee
E’s) have a fixed exercise price due at the
exercise or conversion, other than op-
tions that are out-of-the-money at the time
of exercise. 17 C.F.R. § 240.16b–6(b).
In other words, after May 1, 1991, the
six-month holding period under section
16(b) is measured from the date an op-
tion is granted, not when it is exercised
(with exceptions not applicable here).
Thus,afterMay1,1991,section16(b)
interacts with section 83 as follows: if,
for example, shares are acquired through
the exercise of a nonstatutory option in a
transfer taxable under the rules of section
83, the holder of the shares would not be
subject to section 16(b) liability as a result
of an immediate sale of the shares unless
the sale occurred during the six-month
period beginning with the date of grant
of the option. Even if an optionee exer-
cises an option and sells the underlying
shares within six months of the date of
grant of the option, an exemption from
liability under section 16(b) may be avail-
able under other provisions of the SEC
rules.See17 C.F.R. §§ 240.16b–3(d)(1)
and (2). If such an exemption is available
within six months of the date of grant,
the compensation income attributable to
the employee’s exercise of the option is
includable in the employee’s gross income
on the later of the date of exercise and the
date the exemption becomes available. If
such an exemption is not available within
six months from the date of grant, the
compensation income attributable to the
employee’s exercise of the option would
be includable in the employee’s gross in-
come on the later of the date of exercise or
the date that is six months from the date
of grant.
Applying the above rules, because the
option is granted to Employee E on Jan-
uary 2, 2005, the section 16(b) period ap-
plicable to the option expires on July 2 of
that year. Accordingly, the section 16(b)
period expiresbeforethe date that Em-
ployee E exercises the option and the M
shares are transferred to Employee E (on
August 15). Thus, the shares are not sub-
ject to a substantial risk of forfeiture un-
der section 83(c)(3) as a result of sec-
tion 16(b). Moreover, neither the Under-
writing Agreement nor the Insider Trad-
ing Compliance Program imposes a sub-
stantial risk of forfeiture, because the pro-
visions of those agreements do not con-
dition Employee E’s rights in the shares
upon anyone’s “future performance (or re-
fraining from performance) of substantial
services” or on a “condition related to a
purpose of the transfer” of the shares to
Employee E. Accordingly, neither section
83(c)(3) nor the provisions of those agree-
ments preclude taxation under section 83
when the shares resulting from exercise of
theoptionaretransferredtoEmployeeE.
These conclusions are consistent with the
court’s decision inTanner v. Comm’r., 117
T.C. 237 (2001),aff’d, No. 02–60463 (5
th
Cir. Mar. 26, 2003); but seeRobinson
v. Comm’r., 805 F.2d 38 (1
st
Cir. 1986),
rev’g, 82 T.C. 444 (1984).
Additionally, the restrictions imposed
by the referenced agreements and Rule
August 8, 20052602005–32 I.R.B.

10b–5 on Employee E’s sales (or other
trading) of the M shares are “lapse restric-
tions,” because the restrictions imposed
by the Underwriter’s Agreement and Rule
10b–5 are temporary and the restrictions
imposed by the Insider Trading Compli-
ance Program are inapplicable during the
window period. Accordingly, these re-
strictions are ignored when valuing the
shares.Seesection 83(a).
The Department of the Treasury and the
Internal Revenue Service intend to amend
the § 83 regulations to explicitly set forth
the holdings in this revenue ruling.
HOLDING
Under section 83, the compensation in-
come attributable to Employee E’s exer-
cise of the option for M shares is includible
in Employee E’s gross income when the
shares obtained through exercise of the op-
tion are transferred to Employee E, and the
amount of compensation income is deter-
mined without regard to the share-transfer
restrictions imposed by the Underwriter’s
Agreement and the Insider Trading Com-
pliance Program.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue rul-
ing is Michael Hughes of the Office of
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Coun-
sel (Tax Exempt and Government Enti-
ties). For further information regarding
this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Hughes
or Robert Misner at (202) 622–6030 (not
a toll-free number).
Section 446.—General Rule
for Methods of Accounting
Rev. Proc. 2005–47, 2005–32 I.R.B. dated August
8, 2005, provides automatic consent procedures for
certain taxpayers to changetheirmethodofaccount-
ing for credit card cash advance fees to treat these
fees as creating or increasing OID on a pool of credit
card loans that includes the cash advances that give
rise to these fees. This revenue procedure also sets
forth the conditions under which the Commissioner
will not challenge a taxpayer’s treatment of these fees
as creating or increasing OID on a pool of credit card
loans that includes the cash advances that give rise to
the fees. See Rev. Proc. 2005-47, page 269.
Section 1272.—Current
InclusioninIncomeof
Original Issue Discount
Rev. Proc. 2005–47, 2005–32 I.R.B. dated August
8, 2005, provides automatic consent procedures for
certain taxpayers to changetheir method of account-
ing for credit card cash advance fees to treat these
fees as creating or increasing OID on a pool of credit
card loans that includes the cash advances that give
rise to these fees. This revenue procedure also sets
forth the conditions under which the Commissioner
will not challenge a taxpayer’s treatment of these fees
as creating or increasing OID on a pool of credit card
loans that includes the cash advances that give rise to
the fees. See Rev. Proc. 2005-47, page 269.
Section 1273.—Determina-
tion of Amount of Original
Issue Disc
ount
Rev. Proc.
2005–47, 2005–32 I.R.B. dated August
8, 2005, pr
ovides automatic consent procedures for
certain ta
xpayers to change their method of account-
ing for cre
dit card cash advance fees to treat these
fees as cre
ating or increasing OID on a pool of credit
card loan
s that includes the cash advances that give
rise to th
ese fees. This revenue procedure also sets
forth the
conditions under which the Commissioner
will not c
hallenge a taxpayer’s treatment of these fees
as creati
ng or increasing OID on a pool of credit card
loans th
at includes the cash advances that give rise to
the fees
. See Rev. Proc. 2005-47, page 269.
26 CFR 1.1273–2: Determination of issue price and
issue date.
ATM surcharge fees.This ruling holds
that, for federal income tax purposes, a
credit card issuer treats third-party ATM
surcharge fees incurred by its cardhold-
ers as additional amounts loaned to those
cardholders. Further, this is so whether
the credit card issuer reflects the ATM sur-
charge fee on the cardholder’s account as
part of the amount of the cardholder’s cash
advance (as in Situation 1) or as a sepa-
rately stated amount (as in Situation 2).
Rev. Rul. 2005–47
ISSUE
If a credit card holder uses the credit
card to obtain a cash advance from an ATM
and, as a result, incurs a liability for an
ATM surcharge fee, how does the credit
card issuer treat for federal income tax pur-
poses the amount that it remits to the owner
or operator of the ATM in satisfaction of
the cardholder’s liability?
FACTS
Xissues credit cards. Each credit card
allows the cardholder to access a revolving
line of credit to make purchases of goods
and services and to obtain cash advances.
Cardholders may obtain cash advances, for
example, by using their credit cards to ob-
tain cash from an automated teller ma-
chine (ATM).Xdoes not own or operate
any ATMs and does not impose any ATM
transaction fees on its cardholders under its
cardholder agreements.
Situation 1:Xissues a credit card to
cardholderA,andAuses the credit card to
obtain a cash advance of $100 at an ATM
owned byY.AfterAinitiates the transac-
tion requesting $100,Ais informed that, if
the transaction is completed, an ATM sur-
charge fee of $5 will be deducted from the
$100 cash advance requested byA.Aac-
cepts liability for the $5 ATM surcharge
fee, and the transaction, in which $95 of
funds are disbursed toA, is completed.
UponY’s request toXfor reimbursement
forA’s ATM cash advance transaction,X
remits $100 toYand reflects a $100 cash
advance onA’s account.
Situation 2: The facts are the same as
inSituation 1except thatAuses an ATM
operated byZto obtain a cash advance of
$125 and that the transaction is handled
as follows. AfterAinitiates the transac-
tion requesting $125,Ais informed that,
ifAcompletes the transaction, a $5 ATM
surcharge fee will be charged toA’s credit
card in addition to the $125 cash advance
requested byA.Aaccepts liability for the
$5 ATM surcharge fee, and the transac-
tion, in which $125 of funds are disbursed
toA, is completed. UponZ’s request for
reimbursement forA’s ATM cash advance
transaction, which includes a $5 ATM sur-
charge fee,Xremits $130 toZand reflects
onA’s account both a $125 cash advance
and a $5 ATM surcharge fee.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1.1273–2(g) of the Income Tax
Regulations provides rules for determin-
ing the treatment of certain cash payments
made incident to lending transactions.
Section 1.1273–2(g)(4) provides rules for
determining the treatment of these pay-
ments when made between the lender
and a person other than the borrower (the
“third party”). If, as part of a lending
2005–32 I.R.B.261August 8, 2005

transaction, the lender makes a payment
to a third party, that payment is treated in
appropriate circumstances as an additional
amount loaned to the borrower and then
paid by the borrower to the third party.
In bothSituations 1and2,the$5ATM
surcharge fee is imposed onAby the third
party owner or operator of the ATM, not
byX.WhenXremits an amount inclusive
oftheATMsurchargefeetoYinSitua-
tion 1and toZinSituation 2,Xis making
those payments on behalf ofA. Therefore,
in bothSituations 1and2, the $5 ATM sur-
charge fee is appropriately treated under
§ 1.1273–2(g)(4) as an additional amount
loaned byXtoAand then paid byAtoYor
Z.ThisissowhetherXreflects the $5 ATM
surcharge fee onA’s account as part of the
amount ofA’s cash advance (as inSitua-
tion 1) or as a separately stated amount (as
inSituation 2).
HOLDING
In bothSituations 1and2, for federal
income tax purposes the credit card is-
suer treats third-party ATM surcharge fees
incurred by its cardholders as additional
amounts loaned to those cardholders.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this rev-
enue ruling are Jonathan Silver and
Tina Jannotta of the Office of Chief Coun-
sel (Financial Institutions and Products).
For further information regarding this rev-
enue ruling, contact the principal authors
at (202) 622–3930 (not a toll-free call).
August 8, 20052622005–32 I.R.B.

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Foreign Bank Interest Expense
Allocation to Effectively
Connected Income
Notice 2005–53
SECTION 1. OVERVIEW
On March 8, 1996, final regulations
were published in the Federal Register
(T.D. 8658, 1996–1 C.B. 161 [61 FR
9326]; Treas. Dec. Int. Rev. 8658), under
section 1.882–5 regarding the determina-
tion of the interest expense deduction of
a foreign corporation engaged in a U.S.
trade or business. The Treasury Depart-
ment and the Internal Revenue Service
have monitored these provisions to ensure
that they continue to produce results that
are consistent with the policies under-
lying the regulations, in light of current
economic circumstances. The Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that, in
the context of the banking industry, certain
changes to the regulations will facilitate
compliance. This notice describes such
changes, which will apply to determine
the interest expense deduction of a for-
eign corporation that is a bank, within
the meaning of section 585(a)(2)(B) with-
out regard to the second sentence thereof
(hereafter “foreign bank”). The Treasury
Department and IRS intend to issue regu-
lations consistent with this notice.
The remainder of this notice is divided
into seven sections. Section 2 provides
relevant legal background. Section 3 pro-
vides guidance on the coordination of sec-
tion 1.882–5 with treaties. Section 4 in-
vites the submission of data and other in-
formation relevant to the consideration of
a revised fixed ratio available for purposes
of determination of U.S.-connected liabil-
ities in Step 2 of section 1.882–5. Sec-
tion 5 provides guidance on the determina-
tion of the applicable rate for excess inter-
est under the adjusted U.S.-booked liabil-
ities method in Step 3 of section 1.882–5.
Section 6 solicits comments on coordina-
tion of Step 1 determination of U.S. assets
on the adjusted or fair market value ba-
sis with Step 2 determination of U.S.-con-
nected liabilities using the fixed or actual
ratio. Section 7 provides information on
submitting comments. Finally, section 8
provides drafting information.
SECTION 2. LEGAL BACKGROUND
Section 1.882–5 generally requires
a foreign corporation to determine the
amount of interest expense that is al-
locable under section 882(c) to income
effectively connected (or treated as effec-
tively connected) with the conduct of the
foreign corporation’s trade or business in
the United States by a three step calcula-
tion.
Step 1 determines the total value of the
U.S. assets of the foreign corporation, gen-
erally the assets that produce (or would
produce) income effectively connected
with the conduct of the U.S. trade or busi-
ness of the foreign corporation. The value
of the U.S. assets is their adjusted basis,
unless the taxpayer makes an election to
value the assets on the basis of their fair
market value.
Step 2 determines the U.S.-connected
liabilities of the foreign corporation as the
product of the U.S. assets multiplied ei-
ther by the actual ratio of worldwide lia-
bilities to worldwide assets or, if the tax-
payer makes an election, by a fixed ratio,
currently 93-percent. If the taxpayer has
elected to value U.S. assets on the basis
of fair market value for purposes of Step
1, then the taxpayer must value worldwide
assets on a fair market value basis for pur-
poses of Step 2.
Step 3 determines the allocable amount
of interest expense under the adjusted U.S.
booked liabilities (“AUSBL”) method, or,
if the taxpayer makes an election, under
the separate currency pools method. Un-
der the AUSBL method, the foreign corpo-
ration’s interest expense is based on the in-
terest expense on the foreign corporation’s
U.S. books. If the U.S. booked liabilities
exceed the U.S.-connected liabilities, then
the foreign bank’s U.S. booked interest ex-
pense is scaled down. If the U.S.-con-
nected liabilities exceed the U.S.-booked
liabilities, interest expense in addition to
the U.S. booked interest expense is allo-
cated by reference to the foreign U.S. dol-
lar borrowing rate multiplied by the excess
U.S.-connected liabilities. Under the sepa-
rate currency pools method, the worldwide
interest expense is allocated to effectively
connected income based on the U.S.-con-
nected liabilities ineach currency multi-
plied by the foreign bank’s worldwide rate
for liabilities in such currency.
Rules on the time and manner of mak-
ing and changing the various elections are
provided in sections 1.882–5(a)(7) and
1.882–5(b)(2).
SECTION 3. COORDINATION OF THE
DETERMINATION OF THE INTEREST
EXPENSE DEDUCTION FOR
FOREIGN BANKS AND TREATIES
Section 1.882–5(a)(2) currently states
that “[t]he provisions of this section pro-
vide the exclusive rules for determining
the interest expense attributable to the
business profits of a permanent establish-
ment under a U.S. income tax treaty.”
This statement is no longer accurate in
light of the income tax treaties entered
into with the United Kingdom and Japan,
1
and, therefore, will be eliminated by the
amendments to the regulations.
TheExchangeofNotestothecurrent
United States-United Kingdom and United
States-Japan income tax treaties adopt the
principles of Article 9(1) for determining
the profits attributable to a permanent es-
tablishment.
2
Both Notes address the al-
location of the capital of financial insti-
tutions to their permanent establishments,
stating in pertinent part that the Contract-
ing States may treat the permanent estab-
lishment
as having the same amount of capital
that it would need to support its activi-
ties if it were a distinct and separate en-
terprise engaged in the same or similar
activities. With respect to financial in-
stitutions other than insurance compa-
nies, a Contracting State may determine
the amount of capital to be attributed
to a permanent establishment by allo-
cating the institution’s total equity be-
tween its various offices on the basis of
the proportion of the financial institu-
1
SeeUnited States-United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty, Article 7 (July 24, 2001);United States-Japan Income Tax Treaty, Article 7 (November 6, 2003) and accompanying Exchange of
Notes.
2
Exchange of Notes, United States-Japan Income Tax Treaty, para. 2 (July 24,2001) and United States-United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty (July 24, 2001).
2005–32 I.R.B.263August 8, 2005

tion’s risk-weightedassets attributable
to each of them.
3
The Treasury Technical Explanations of
the United Kingdom and Japan treaties ac-
knowledge that the allocation method pro-
vided by section 1.882–5 does not take into
account the relative riskiness of assets that
are attributable to a permanent establish-
ment and that equal weighting of risk, in
some cases, “may require a taxpayer to al-
locate more capital to the United States
(and therefore would reduce the taxpayer’s
interest expense deduction) than is appro-
priate.”
4
Accordingly, the two treaties permit
United Kingdom and Japanese resident
financial institutions the use of an alter-
native approach to the determination of
their taxable income, without the sec-
tion 1.882–5 determination of interest
expense, for purposes of establishing the
upper limit with respect to the amount of
taxthatmaybeimposedonaU.S.per-
manent establishment of a foreign bank.
Such an alternative approach under the
treaties would incorporate risk-weighting
of the foreign bank’s assets as well as
other consequential deviations from the
rules of section 1.882–5 in line with the
arm’s length principles of Articles 7 and
9(1) of those treaties.
As reflected in the Notes and Technical
Explanations, the two treaties require an
allocation of sufficient equity capital in de-
termining the profits attributable to a per-
manent establishment. The amount of eq-
uity capital shown on a taxpayer’s book’s
is not determinative. Therefore, it will be
acceptable only to the extent such allot-
ment is sufficient to support the assets and
risks attributable to the permanent estab-
lishment.
The Treasury Department and IRS con-
tinue to believe that application of sec-
tion 1.882–5 also results in a sufficient
allocation of equity capital to a perma-
nent establishment, and is simpler to ap-
ply than an alternative approach under the
treaties. As stated in both Technical Ex-
planations, taxpayers are not required to
use the risk-weighted approach for allocat-
ing equity capital provided by the treaties.
Rather, taxpayers may continue to use sec-
tion 1.882–5 in lieu of an alternative ap-
proach under the treaties.
SECTION 4. DETERMINATION OF
U.S.-CONNECTED LIABILITIES
UNDER THE FIXED RATIO FOR
FOREIGN BANKS
As noted, Step 2 of the calculation is
used to determine the amount of U.S.-con-
nected liabilities. Section 1.882–5(c)(1)
provides that “[t]he amount of U.S.-con-
nected liabilities for the taxable year
equals the total value of U.S. assets for the
taxable year (as determined under para-
graph (b)(3) of this section) multiplied
by the actual ratio for the taxable year
(as determined under paragraph (c)(2) of
this section) or, if the taxpayer has made
an election in accordance with paragraph
(c)(4) of this section, by the fixed ratio.” In
1996, the final regulations established the
fixed ratio for foreign banks at 93 percent.
The Treasury Department and IRS have
considered data from more recent years to
determine whether the 93 percent fixed ra-
tio continues to be appropriate. Based on
that examination, it appears that a fixed ra-
tio of between 94 and 96 percent may be
more appropriate. The Treasury Depart-
ment and IRS invite the submission of data
and other information relevant to the con-
sideration of a revised fixed ratio, includ-
ing information about the nature of the as-
sets and risks related to the U.S. trade or
business as compared to the business con-
ducted outside the United States.
It is expected that taxpayers will be per-
mitted to make new elections with respect
to section 1.882–5 to take into account
these changes.
SECTION 5. DETERMINATION OF
EXCESS INTEREST OF BANKS
UNDER THE ADJUSTED U.S.-BOOK
LIABILITY METHOD
Under the Adjusted U.S. Booked Lia-
bilities (“AUSBL”) method taxpayers may
be required under certain facts and circum-
stances to calculate a portion of their in-
terest expense allocation by reference to
the average U.S. dollar borrowing rate in-
curred outside theUnited States. Sec-
tion 1.882–5(d)(5) provides that where the
U.S.-connected liabilities exceed the tax-
payer’s U.S. booked liabilities (as defined
for banks in section 1.882–5(d)(2)(iii)), the
excess U.S.-connectedliabilities are multi-
plied by the taxpayer’s average U.S. dollar
borrowing rate with respect to interest ex-
pense and liabilities shown on the books of
the taxpayer’s offices or branches outside
the United States. This portion of the Step
3 allocation is referred to as the “excess in-
terest.”
In prior regulations (“the 1980 regu-
lations”), section 1.882–5 provided that
where information necessary to compute
the actual foreign U.S. dollar borrowing
rate could not “be reasonably obtained,”
then “any method that reasonably approx-
imates the actual rate” could be substi-
tuted so long as it was consistently ap-
plied from year to year.
5
The 1980 reg-
ulations provided that the 30-day LIBOR
rate may constitute an appropriate proxy
for an actual foreign borrowing rate but did
not specify that the use of the published
LIBOR rate could be used outright if the
actual foreign borrowing rate was capa-
ble of being proved. Where the total for-
eign U.S. dollar borrowings werede min-
imis, the prior regulations substituted the
actual average borrowing rate of the for-
eign corporation’s trade or business within
the United States.
Where a foreign corporation elects
both the fixed ratio under Step 2 and the
AUSBL method under Step 3, it is possible
for the taxpayer’s entire interest expense
allocation to be determined by reference
to the books and records of its trade or
business within the United States. This
may be true under the current regulations
if the allocation for the taxpayer does
not result in excess interest but, instead,
is subject to the scale-down rule under
section 1.882–5(d)(4). Otherwise, when
these elections are made together, resort
may still be necessary to information typi-
cally maintained outside the United States.
In many cases, the information would be
collected only for purposes of computing
the taxpayer’s excess interest.
To facilitate administrability both for
foreign bank taxpayers and the IRS, the
amendments to the regulations will pro-
vide that such taxpayers who are already
3
Id.
4
Technical Explanation of the United States-United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty, Art. 7, para. 3, CCH, p. 201,301; United States-Japan Income Tax Treaty, Art. 7, para. 3, CCH, p. 113,320.
5
§1.882–5(b)(2)(i)(B), T.D. 7749, 1981–1 C.B. 390, 394.
August 8, 20052642005–32 I.R.B.

eligible to use the AUSBL method for a
particular year may make a binding an-
nual election to calculate excess interest
under the AUSBL method by reference to
the published 30-day average LIBOR rate
for such year, rather than the actual for-
eign U.S. dollar borrowing rate prescribed
in §1.882–5(d)(5), by using such rate to
calculate its interest expense deduction on
a timely filed original Federal income tax
return for such year. The election provi-
sions of §1.882–5(a)(7) shall apply on an
annual basis without regard to the binding
5-year minimum period. Such taxpayers
may begin using such rate for tax years
ending on or after the date on which this
notice is published.
SECTION 6. COORDINATION
OF DETERMINATION OF U.S.
ASSETS ON AN ADJUSTED OR
FAIR MARKET VALUE BASIS
WITH DETERMINATION OF
U.S.-CONNECTED LIABILITIES
USING THE FIXED OR ACTUAL
RATIO
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize that an increase in the fixed ra-
tio, as contemplated by section 3 of this no-
tice, will render the fixed ratio relatively
more attractive as compared to the actual
ratio for purposes of the Step 2 determina-
tion of the U.S.-connected liabilities of for-
eign banks. Pursuant to the existing reg-
ulations, foreign banks may combine an
election of the fixed ratio for the Step 2
determination of U.S.-connected liabilities
with an election of the fair market value
basis for the Step 1 determination of U.S.
assets.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are reconsidering whether combining
these elections is consistent with the poli-
cies underlying the regulations. In partic-
ular, it is unclear that such a combination
of elections would produce an appropri-
ate result in light of the prevalence and
significance of intangibles in the banking
industry. The Step 2 determination of
U.S.-connected liabilities using an actual
ratio determined on a fair market value
basis reflects in a balanced manner the
effect of intangibles because such intangi-
bles would be taken into account at their
fair market in both steps. The Step 2 de-
termination of U.S.-connected liabilities
usingthefixedratioinconjunctionwitha
fair market value election in Step 1 may
not similarly reflect in a balanced manner
the effect of intangibles. The Treasury
Department and the IRS are concerned,
therefore, that the current ability to apply
a fair market value election in conjunction
with a fixed ratio election may distort the
Step 2 determination of U.S.-connected
liabilities. The Treasury Department and
the IRS solicit comments to assist them in
their review of this matter.
SECTION 7. SUBMISSION OF
COMMENTS
Taxpayers may submit comments to:
CC:ITA:RU (PGP–125111–02), Room
5226, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered between the hours of 8 a.m. and
5 p.m. to CC:ITA:RU (PGP–125111–02),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Ser-
vice, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC. Alternatively, tax-
payers may submit comments electron-
ically via the Internet by submitting com-
ments directly to the IRS Internet site at
http://www.irs.gov/tax_regs/regslist.htm.
SECTION 8. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
Paul S. Epstein of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International). However,
other personnel from the IRS and the Trea-
sury Department participated in its devel-
opment. For further information regard-
ing this notice, contact Paul S. Epstein and
Gregory Spring at (202) 622–3870 (not a
toll-free call).
2005 Marginal Production
Rates
Notice 2005–55
Section 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Internal
Revenue Code defines the term “applica-
ble percentage” for purposes of determin-
ing percentage depletion for oil and gas
produced from marginal properties. The
applicable percentage is the percentage
(not greater than 25 percent) equal to the
sum of 15 percent, plus one percentage
point for each whole dollar by which $20
exceeds the reference price (determined
under § 29(d)(2)(C)) for crude oil for
the calendar year preceding the calendar
year in which the taxable year begins.
The reference price determined under
§ 29(d)(2)(C) for the 2004 calendar year
is $36.75.
Table 1 contains the applicable percent-
ages for marginal production for taxable
years beginning in calendar years 1991
through 2005.
2005–32 I.R.B.265August 8, 2005

Notice 2005–55 Table 1
APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE FOR MARGINAL PRODUCTION
Calendar YearApplicable Percentage
199115 percent
199218 percent
199319 percent
199420 percent
199521 percent
199620 percent
199716 percent
199817 percent
199924 percent
200019 percent
200115 percent
200215 percent
200315 percent
200415 percent
200515 percent
The principal author of this notice is
Kelly R. Morrison-Lee of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs
and Special Industries). For further in-
formation regarding this notice, contact
Ms. Morrison-Lee at (202) 622–3120 (not
a toll-free call).
2005 Section 43 Inflation
Adjustment
Notice 2005–56
Section 43(b)(3)(B) of the Internal
Revenue Code requires the Secretary to
publish an inflation adjustment factor.
The enhanced oil recovery credit under
§ 43 for any taxable year is reduced if
the “reference price,” determined under
§ 29(d)(2)(C), for the calendar year pre-
ceding the calendar year in which the
taxable year begins, is greater than $28
multiplied by the inflation adjustment fac-
tor for that year.
The term “inflation adjustment factor”
means, with respect to any calendar year,
a fraction the numerator of which is the
GNP implicit price deflator for the preced-
ing calendar year and the denominator of
which is the GNP implicit price deflator
for 1990.
Because the reference price for the 2004
calendar year ($36.75) does not exceed
$28 multiplied by the inflation adjustment
factor for the 2005 calendar year, the en-
hanced oil recovery credit for qualified
costspaidorincurredin2005isdeter-
mined without regard to the phase-out for
crude oil price increases.
Table 1 contains the GNP implicit price
deflator used for the 2005 calendar year,
as well as the previously published GNP
implicit price deflators used for the 1991
through 2004 calendar years.
Notice 2005–56 TABLE 1
GNP IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATORS
Calendar YearGNP Implicit Price Deflator
1990112.9 (used for 1991)
1991117.0 (used for 1992)
1992120.9 (used for 1993)
1993124.1 (used for 1994)
1994126.0 (used for 1995)
1995107.5 (used for 1996)
1996109.7 (used for 1997)
1997112.35 (used for 1998)
1998112.64 (used for 1999)
1999104.59 (used for 2000)
2000106.89 (used for 2001)
2001109.31 (used for 2002)
2002110.63 (used for 2003)
2003105.67 (used for 2004)
2004108.23 (used for 2005)
August 8, 20052662005–32 I.R.B.

* Beginning in 1995, the GNP implicit pricedeflator was rebased relative to 1992. The 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to
compute the 1996 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 93.6.
** Beginning in 1997, two digits follow the decimal point in the GNPimplicit price deflator. The 1990 GNP price deflator used to
compute the 1998 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 93.63.
*** Beginning in 1999, the GNP implicit price deflator was rebased relative to 1996. The 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used
to compute the 2000 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 86.53.
**** Beginning in 2003, the GNP implicit price deflator was rebased relative to 2000. The 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used
to compute the 2004 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 81.59.
Notice 2005–56 TABLE 2
INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AND PHASE-OUT AMOUNTS
Calendar YearInflation Adjustment FactorPhase-out Amount
19911.00000
19921.03630
19931.07080
19941.09920
19951.11600
19961.14850
19971.17200
19981.19990
19991.20300
20001.20870
20011.23530
20021.26330
20031.27850
20041.29520
20051.32660
Table 2 contains the inflation adjust-
ment factor and the phase-out amount
for taxable years beginning in the 2005
calendar year as well as the previously
published inflation adjustment factors and
phase-out amounts for taxable years be-
ginning in 1991 through 2004 calendar
years.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
Kelly R. Morrison-Lee of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs
and Special Industries). For further in-
formation regarding this notice, contact
Ms. Morrison-Lee at (202) 622–3120 (not
a toll-free call).
Termination of Tobacco
Quotas and Price Support
Programs
Notice 2005–57
INTRODUCTION
This notice modifies and supersedes
Notice 2005–51, 2005–28 I.R.B. 74, dated
July 11, 2005. The modifications to Notice
2005–51 are effective as of June 21, 2005,
the date Notice 2005–51 was released.
PURPOSE
This notice provides answers to fre-
quently asked questions regarding the tax
treatment of federal payments made pur-
suant to § 622 of the Fair and Equitable
Tobacco Reform Act of 2004, Title VI of
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,
Pub. L. No. 108–357, 118 Stat. 1418,
1521–36 (2004) (the Act).
BACKGROUND
Sections 611 and 612 of the Act ter-
minate the tobacco marketing quota pro-
gram and the tobacco price support pro-
gram. Section 622 of the Act provides that
the United States Department of Agricul-
ture (USDA) will offer to enter into a con-
tract with an eligible tobacco quota holder
(Owner) under which the Owner may re-
ceive total payments of $7 per pound of
quota in 10 equal annual payments in fis-
cal years 2005 through 2014 (Owner Pay-
ments) in exchange for the termination of
the tobacco marketing quotas and related
price support. Section 622 does not pro-
vide for stated interest on payments due
under the contracts.
For federal income tax purposes,
Owner Payments are the proceeds from
a sale of an Owner’s tobacco quota as of
the date on which the Owner and USDA
enter into a contract for Owner Payments
with respect to the quota (Sale Date). See
Q & A–12 for a special rule regarding
when a transfer of a quota is deemed to
2005–32 I.R.B.267August 8, 2005

occur, under certain circumstances, for
purposes of § 1031 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q–1. Are Owner Payments received un-
der the Act subject to federal income tax?
A–1. Yes, Owner Payments are sub-
ject to federal income tax. If the amounts
received by the Owner are more than the
Owner’s adjusted basis in the quota, the
Owner has a taxable gain; if the Owner
receives less than the Owner’s adjusted
basis, the Owner has a loss that may
be deductible for tax purposes if the re-
quirements for deduction under § 165
are satisfied. In determining an Owner’s
gain or loss, the amount received for the
quota does not include any amount treated
as interest for federal tax purposes. See
Q & A–7 for help in determining whether
any portion of an Owner Payment is
treated as interest for federal tax purposes.
Q–2. How does an Owner determine
the adjusted basis of a quota?
A–2. The adjusted basis of a quota
is determined differently depending upon
how the Owner acquired the quota.
•An Owner who holds a quota that is
derived from an original grant by the
federal government has a basis of zero
in the quota.
•The basis of a purchased quota is the
price the Owner paid for it.
•Generally an Owner who received a
quota as a gift has the same basis in
the quota as the person who gave the
quota to the Owner. Under certain cir-
cumstances, the basis is increased by
an amount related to the amount of gift
tax paid. If the basis is greater than
the fair market value of the quota at the
time of the gift, the basis for determin-
ing loss is that fair market value.
•The basis of a quota that an Owner
inherited generally is the fair market
value of the quota at the time of the
decedent’s death.
The basis of a tobacco quota is not sub-
ject to adjustment through amortization,
depletion, or depreciation. However, if
an Owner improperly has deducted any
amount for these purposes, the Owner
must reduce the basis by the amount de-
ducted before determining the Owner’s
gain or loss. A similar reduction in the ba-
sis of a quota must be made for any amount
previously deducted as a loss because of
a reduction in the number of pounds of
tobacco allowable under the quota. If an
Owner purchased a quota and deducted
the entire cost in the year of purchase, then
the Owner’s basis in the quota is zero.
Q–3. If an Owner has a gain and re-
ports Owner Payments under the install-
ment method, when must the gain be in-
cluded in income?
A–3. The installment method may
be used to report gain if an Owner re-
ceives at least one Owner Payment after
the close of the Owner’s taxable year that
includes the Sale Date. The amount of the
gain is the excess of the total amount of
Owner Payments to be received, reduced
by any amount treated as interest, over
the Owner’s adjusted basis in the quota.
Under the installment method, a propor-
tionate amount of the gain is taken into
account in each year in which an Owner
Payment is received. See the instructions
for Form 6252,Installment Sale Income.
Q–4. If an Owner has a gain and elects
not to report Owner Payments under the
installment method, when must the gain be
included in income?
A–4. The Owner must report the entire
gain on the Owner’s federal income tax
return for the taxable year that includes the
Sale Date.
Q–5. Is the gain or loss with respect to
a quota ordinary or capital gain or loss?
A–5. Whether the gain or loss with
respect to a quota is ordinary or capital
depends on how the Owner used the quota.
•If an Owner used a quota in the trade
or business of farming and, on the
Sale Date, the Owner’s holding pe-
riod for the quota was more than one
year, then the transaction is reported
under § 1231 on Form 4797,Sales of
Business Property. If an Owner has no
other § 1231 transactions reportable
on Form 4797, any gain is treated as
long-term capital gain and any loss
is treated as ordinary loss. Even if
an Owner has other reportable § 1231
transactions, the net result of all § 1231
transactions reported generally is ei-
ther long-term capital gain or ordinary
loss. See the instructions for Form
4797 for more detailed information.
•If an Owner held a quota for invest-
ment purposes, or for the production
of income, but did not use the quota in
a trade or business, any gain or loss is
capital gain or loss.
Under certain circumstances, some or
all of the gain must be recharacterized and
reported as ordinary income. If an Owner
previously deducted (1) the cost of acquir-
ing a quota, (2) amounts for amortization,
depletion, or depreciation, or (3) amounts
to reflect a reduction in the quota pounds,
any gain is taxed as ordinary income up
to the amount previously deducted. The
Owner must report this amount of ordinary
income on the Owner’s return for the tax-
able year that includes the Sale Date, even
if the Owner uses the installment method
to report the remainder of the gain.
Q–6. Are Owner Payments received
under the Act subject to Self-Employ-
ment Contributions Act (SECA) tax (see
§ 1402)?
A–6. No.
Q–7. Is any portion of an Owner Pay-
ment treated as interest for federal tax pur-
poses?
A–7. (a) If the total amount to be paid
under a contract does not exceed $3,000,
no portion of an Owner Payment is treated
as interest for federal tax purposes.
(b) If § 483 applies to a contract, a por-
tion of each Owner Payment (other than
an Owner Payment due within six months
of the Sale Date) is treated as interest for
federal tax purposes. For example, § 483
generally applies to a contract if the to-
tal amount to be paid under the contract
does not exceed $250,000 or if a cash
method election is made under §§ 1274A
and 1.1274A–1(c). A contract is eligible
for the cash method election only if the
total amount to be paid under the contract
does not exceed the inflation-adjusted
amount for a cash method debt instrument
($3,202,100 for 2005).
(c) In all situations not described in (a)
or (b) above, a portion of each Owner Pay-
ment is treated as interest for federal tax
purposes under § 1274.
(d) In general, to determine the amount
of an Owner Payment that is treated as
interest, see § 483 or § 1274, whichever is
applicable, and the regulations thereunder.
You may wish to consult a tax advisor for
August 8, 20052682005–32 I.R.B.

assistance in determining the portion of an
Owner Payment that is treated as interest
and the taxable year in which the interest
is includible in income.
Q–8. Does an individual Owner’s gain
or loss from Owner Payments qualify for
farm income averaging?
A–8. No. A tobacco quota is consid-
ered an interest in land, and farm income
averaging is not available for gain or loss
arising from the sale or other disposition of
land.
Q–9. Are Owner Payments subject to
information reporting?
A–9. Yes. Because a tobacco quota
is considered an interest in land, the to-
tal amount received under a contract by
an owner in a taxable year generally will
be reported by USDA on Form 1099–S,
Proceeds From Real Estate Transactions,
if the amount is $600 or more. In addi-
tion, any portion of an Owner Payment
treated as interest for federal tax purposes
generally will be reported by USDA on
Form 1099–INT,Interest Income,iftheto-
tal amount of interest received in a taxable
year is $600 or more.
Q–10. Is the termination of a tobacco
quota under the Act an involuntary conver-
sion of the quota?
A–10. No.
Q–11. May an Owner enter into a like-
kind exchange of a quota?
A–11. Yes. An Owner may postpone
reporting the gain or loss from the termina-
tion of a quota by entering into a like-kind
exchange pursuant to § 1031 and the reg-
ulations thereunder. The date on which an
Owner and USDA enter into a contract for
Owner Payments with respect to a quota
is treated as the date on which the quota
is transferred for purposes of § 1031. An
intermediary is treated as satisfying the re-
quirements of § 1.1031(k)–1(g)(4)(iii)(B)
(relating to the exchange agreement re-
quired to be entered into by a qualified
intermediary) if the intermediary enters
into a written agreement with the Owner
(the exchange agreement) before the date
on which the quota is transferred and
under the exchange agreement the inter-
mediary—
(a) is assigned the right to receive all
Owner Payments under the contract made
after the date of the exchange agreement;
(b) acquires the replacement property;
and
(c) transfers the replacement property to
the Owner.
Q–12. Is transitional relief available
for purposes of § 1031 for an Owner who
could not make timely arrangements for a
like-kind exchange under Notice 2005–51?
A–12. Yes, transitional relief is avail-
able to an Owner who applied by June
17, 2005, to enter into a contract with
USDA for Owner Payments. In determin-
ing whether such Owner has entered into
a like-kind exchange pursuant to § 1031
and the regulations thereunder, the date
on which the Owner transfers a quota
is deemed to be September 16, 2005.
To qualify for this transitional relief, an
Owner who receives an Owner Payment
must remit the amount of the Owner Pay-
ment to the qualified intermediary within
5 business days of the later of the date the
exchange agreement is entered into or the
date the Owner Payment is received by the
Owner; in such case the Owner Payment is
treated as being received by the qualified
intermediary.
SUBSEQUENT GUIDANCE
Section 623 of the Act provides that
USDA will offer to enter into a con-
tract with an eligible tobacco producer
(Grower) under which the Grower may re-
ceive total payments of up to $3 per pound
of quota in 10 equal annual payments in
fiscal years 2005 through 2014 (Grower
Payments) in exchange for the termina-
tion of the tobacco marketing quotas and
related price support. Grower Payments
are determined by reference to the amount
of quota under which the Grower pro-
duced (or planted) tobacco during the
2002, 2003, and 2004 tobacco market-
ing years and are prorated based on the
number of years that the Grower produced
(or planted) quota tobacco during those
years. The federal tax treatment of Grower
Payments is expected to be addressed in
subsequent guidance.
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Notice 2005–51 is modified and, as
modified, is superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
Marnette M. Myers of the Office of As-
sociate Chief Counsel (Income Tax &
Accounting). For further information re-
garding Q & A–7 of this notice, contact
Pamela Lew of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products) at (202) 622–3950 (not
a toll-free call). For further information
regarding the remainder of this notice,
contact Ms. Myers at (202) 622–4920 (not
a toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.204: Changes in accounting periods and
in methods of accounting.
(Also Part 1, §§ 446, 1272, 1273.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–47
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure describes con-
ditions under which the Commissioner
will allow a taxpayerto treat credit card
cash advance fees as creating or increas-
ing original issue discount (OID) on a
pool of credit card loans that includes the
cash advances that give rise to these fees.
This revenue procedure also provides the
exclusive procedure by which a taxpayer
within the scope of this revenue procedure
may obtain the Commissioner’s consent to
change its method of accounting for credit
card cash advance fees to a method that
treats these fees as creating or increasing
OID on a pool of credit card loans that
includes the cash advances that give rise
to the fees.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01 Certain taxpayers issue credit cards
that allow cardholders to access a revolv-
ing line of credit to purchase goods and
services (“credit card purchase transac-
tions”) and to obtain cash advances (“cash
advance transactions”). The credit card
agreement between the credit card issuer
and the cardholder sets forth the terms and
conditions that govern the cardholder’s
use of the credit card, including identifica-
tion of which credit card transactions are
treated as cash advance transactions.
.02 Under many credit card agree-
ments, the credit card issuer imposes a
fee (a “credit card cash advance fee”) on
the cardholder when the cardholder uses
the credit card to conduct a cash advance
transaction. Although the terms of credit
card agreements may vary, a credit card
2005–32 I.R.B.269August 8, 2005

cash advance fee is generally a flat fee
or a percentage of the face amount of the
cash advance (often subject to minimum
and maximum limits). Credit card cash
advance fees are generally imposed in ad-
dition to any stated periodic interest rate
charges.
.03 Under § 1273(a)(1) of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code, OID is the excess
of the stated redemption price at matu-
rity (SRPM) of a debt instrument over
the issue price of that instrument. Un-
der § 1.1273–1(b) of the Income Tax
Regulations, the SRPM is the sum of all
payments provided by the debt instrument
other than payments of qualified stated
interest (QSI). Under § 1.1273–1(c), QSI
is stated interest that is unconditionally
payable in cash or property (other than
debt instruments of the issuer) or that will
be constructively received under § 451 at
least annually at a single fixed rate. See
§ 1.1273–2 for rules to determine the issue
price of a debt instrument.
.04 Section 1272(a)(6) provides rules
for determining the daily portions of OID
on certain debt instruments. The instru-
ments covered includeREMIC regular in-
terests and qualified mortgages held by
REMICs, debt instruments the payments
under which may be accelerated by reason
of prepayments of other obligations secur-
ing the debt instruments, and any pool of
debt instruments the yield on which may
be affected by reason of prepayments.
.05 Rev. Proc. 2004–33, 2004–1 C.B.
989, describes conditions under which
the Commissioner will allow a taxpayer
within the scope of that procedure to treat
credit card late fees as creating or increas-
ing the amount of OID on a pool of credit
card loans to which those fees relate. Un-
der Rev. Proc. 2004–33, a credit card late
fee that is a one-time charge or a flat sum
imposedinadditiontoastatedperiodic
interest charge may be treated as creating
or increasing OID if that fee otherwise
satisfies the revenue procedure’s require-
ments.
.06 Any change in the taxpayer’s treat-
ment of credit card cash advance fees that
affects when income is recognized is a
change in method of accounting to which
the provisions of §§ 446 and 481, and
the regulations thereunder, apply. Under
§ 1.446–1(e)(2)(i), a taxpayer generally
must secure the consent of the Commis-
sioner before changing a method of ac-
counting for federal income tax purposes.
Section 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) authorizes the
Commissioner to prescribe administrative
procedures setting forth the terms and
conditions necessary to obtain consent to
change a method of accounting.
.07 Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B.
327 (as modified and clarified by An-
nouncement 2002–17, 2002–1 C.B. 561,
modified and amplified by Rev. Proc.
2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, and ampli-
fied, clarified, and modified by Rev. Proc.
2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432), provides
procedures by which taxpayers may ob-
tain automatic consent to change to the
methods of accounting described in the
Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9. Sec-
tion 5.03 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 provides
that, unless otherwise provided, a taxpayer
making a change in method of accounting
under the revenue procedure must take
into account a section 481(a) adjustment
inthemannerprovidedinsection5.04of
Rev. Proc. 2002–9.
SECTION 3. SCOPE
This revenue procedure applies to a tax-
payer if—
.01 The taxpayer issues credit cards al-
lowing cardholders to access a revolving
line of credit established by the taxpayer
both to make credit card purchase transac-
tions and to obtain cash advances; and
.02 For federal income tax purposes, the
taxpayer does not treat the credit card pur-
chase transactions of its cardholders as cre-
ating debt that is given in consideration for
the sale or exchange of property.
SECTION 4. APPLICATION
.01 Subject to subsection .02 of this sec-
tion 4, if a taxpayer is within the scope of
this revenue procedure, the Commissioner
will not challenge the taxpayer’s treatment
of credit card cash advance fees as creating
or increasing the amount of OID on a pool
of credit card loans that includes the cash
advances that give rise to those fees.
.02 Subsection .01 of section 4 of this
revenue procedure applies only if the tax-
payer satisfies all of the requirements of
section 5 of this revenue procedure and, if
the taxpayer is changing its method of ac-
counting, all of the requirements of section
6 of this revenue procedure.
SECTION 5. REQUIREMENTS
A taxpayer must be able to demonstrate
the following:
.01 The amount of any credit card cash
advance fee charged to a cardholder by the
taxpayer is separately stated on the card-
holder’s account when that fee is imposed;
and
.02 Under the credit card agreement,
no amount identified as a credit card cash
advance fee is charged for property or for
specific services performed by the tax-
payer for the benefit of the cardholder.
SECTION 6. CHANGE IN METHOD
OF ACCOUNTING
If a taxpayer within the scope of this
revenue procedure wants to change its
method of accounting for credit card cash
advance fees and if, under the method
to which the taxpayer is changing, these
fees are treated as creating or increasing
the amount of OID on a pool of credit
card loans that includes the cash advances
that give rise to those fees, the taxpayer
must follow the provisions of Rev. Proc.
2002–9 (or its successor), with the follow-
ing modifications:
.01 The scope limitations in section
4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 do not apply to
a taxpayer that makes the change for either
its first or second taxable year ending on
or after December 31, 2004; and
.02 The taxpayer must prepare and file
a Form 3115 in accordance with section 6
of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 and enter the des-
ignated number (“94”) for this automatic
change in method in Line 1a of Form 3115.
SECTION 7. AUDIT PROTECTION
.01 If a taxpayer within the scope of this
revenue procedure currently uses a method
of accounting that treats credit card cash
advance fees as creating or increasing the
amount of OID on a pool of credit card
loans that includes the cash advances that
give rise to those fees, the issue of whether
that treatment is proper will not be raised
by the Commissioner for a taxable year
that ends before December 31, 2004.
.02 If a taxpayer within the scope of this
revenue procedure currently uses a method
of accounting that treats credit card cash
advance fees as creating or increasing the
amount of OID on a pool of credit card
August 8, 20052702005–32 I.R.B.

loans that includes the cash advances that
give rise to those fees and its use of that
method is an issue under consideration
(withinthemeaningofsection3.09of
Rev. Proc. 2002–9) in examination, be-
fore an appeals office, or before the U.S.
Tax Court for any taxable year that ends
before December 31, 2004, that issue will
not be further pursued by the Service.
.03 Neither the audit protection pro-
vided in connection with a change in
a taxpayer’s method of accounting for
credit card cash advance fees that is prop-
erly made under section 6 of this revenue
procedure nor the audit protection pro-
vided under sections 7.01 and 7.02 of this
revenue procedure is a determination by
the Commissioner that the taxpayer is
properly accounting for any OID income
on that pool of credit card loans. Thus,
for example, the Service is not precluded
from pursuing the issue of whether, un-
der § 1272(a)(6), a taxpayer is correctly
accounting for its OIDincome (including
any OID attributable to credit card cash
advance fees) on its pool of credit card
loans.
SECTION 8. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2002–9 is modified and
amplified to include this automatic change
in the APPENDIX.
SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective for
taxable years ending on or after December
31, 2004.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this rev-
enue procedure are Jonathan Silver and
Tina Jannotta of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and
Products). For further information regard-
ing this revenue procedure, contact the
principal authors at (202) 622–3930 (not a
toll-free call).
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
(Also: Part I, §§ 61, 280F; 1.61–21.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–48
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
.01 This revenue procedure provides:
(1) the maximum value of employer-pro-
vided vehicles first made available to em-
ployees for personal use in calendar year
2005 for which the vehicle cents-per-mile
valuation rule provided under section
1.61–21(e) of the Income Tax Regula-
tions may be applicable is $14,800 for a
passenger automobile and $16,300 for a
truck or van; (2) the maximum value of
employer-provided vehicles first made
available to employees for personal use in
calendar year 2005 for which the fleet-av-
erage valuation rule provided under sec-
tion 1.61–21(d) of the regulations may
be applicable is $19,600 for a passenger
automobile and $21,300 for a truck or van.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
.01Ifanemployerprovidesanem-
ployee with a vehicle that is available
to the employee for personal use, the
value of the personal use must generally
be included in the employee’s income
and wages. Internal Revenue Code § 61;
Treas. Reg. § 1.61–21.
.02 For employer-provided passen-
ger automobiles (including trucks and
vans) made available to employees for
personal use that meet the requirements
of section 1.61–21(e)(1) of the regula-
tions, generally the value of the personal
use may be determined under the vehicle
cents-per-mile valuation rule of section
1.61–21(e). However, regulations section
1.61–21(e)(1)(iii)(A) provides that for a
passenger automobile first made avail-
able after 1988 to any employee of the
employer for personal use, the value of
the personal use may not be determined
under the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation
rule for a calendar year if the fair market
value of the passenger automobile (de-
termined pursuant to regulations section
1.61–21(d)(5)(i) through (iv)) on the first
date the passenger automobile is made
available to the employee exceeds a spec-
ified dollar limit.
.03 For employer-provided vehicles
available to employees for personal use
for an entire year, generally the value of
the personal use may be determined un-
der the automobile lease valuation rule
of section 1.61–21(d) of the regulations.
Under this valuation rule, the value of
the personal use is the Annual Lease
Value. Provided the requirements of reg-
ulations section 1.61–21(d)(5)(v) are met,
an employer with a fleet of 20 or more
automobiles may use a fleet-average value
for purposes of calculating the Annual
Lease Values of the automobiles in the
employer’s fleet. The fleet-average value
is the average of the fair market values of
all the automobiles in the fleet. However,
section 1.61–21(d)(5)(v)(D) of the regula-
tions provides that for an automobile first
made available after 1988 to an employee
of the employer for personal use, the value
of the personal use may not be determined
under the fleet-average valuation rule for a
calendar year if the fair market value of the
automobile (determined pursuant to reg-
ulations section 1.61–21(d)(5)(i) through
(v)) on the first date the passenger auto-
mobile is made available to the employee
exceeds a specified dollar limit.
.04 The maximum passenger auto-
mobile values for applying the vehicle
cents-per-mile and the fleet-average value
rules reflect the automobile price inflation
adjustment of Code section 280F(d)(7).
The method of calculating this price in-
flation amount for automobiles other than
trucks and vans uses the “new car” com-
ponent of the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
“automobile component”. When calcu-
lating this price inflation adjustment for
trucks and vans, the “new trucks” com-
ponent of the CPI is used. This results
in somewhat higher maximum values for
trucks and vans. This change reflects the
higher rate of price inflation that trucks and
vans have been subject to since 1988, and
is consistent with the change announced
in Rev. Proc. 2003–75, 2003–2 C.B. 1018
for purposes of calculating depreciation
deductions. See also Rev. Proc. 2004–20,
2004–1 C.B. 642 and 2005–13, 2005–12
I.R.B. 759. For purposes of this revenue
procedure, the term “trucks and vans”
refers to passenger automobiles that are
built on a truck chassis, including mini-
vans and sport utility vehicles (SUVs) that
are built on a truck chassis.
2005–32 I.R.B.271August 8, 2005

SECTION 3. PROCEDURE
.01 Maximum Automobile Value for
Using the Cents-per-mile Valuation Rule.
An employer providing a passenger auto-
mobile for the first time in calendar year
2005 for the personal use of any employee
may determine the value of the personal
use by using the vehicle cents-per-mile
valuation rule in section 1.61–21(e) of the
regulations if its fair market value on the
date it is first made available does not
exceed $14,800 for a passenger automo-
bile other than a truck or van, or $16,300
for a truck or van. If the fair market
value of the passenger automobile exceeds
this amount, the employer may determine
the value of the personal use under the
general valuation rules of regulations sec-
tion 1.61–21(b) or under the special valua-
tion rules of section 1.61–21(d) (Automo-
bile lease valuation) orsection 1.61–21(f)
(Commuting valuation) if the applicable
requirements are met. See Rev. Proc.
2003–75 for guidance on determining the
maximum value of passenger automobiles
first made available during calendar year
2003, and Rev. Proc. 2004–20 for guid-
ance on determining the maximum value
of passenger automobiles first made avail-
able during calendar year 2004.
.02 Maximum Automobile Value for
Using the Fleet-Average Valuation Rule.
An employer with a fleet of 20 or more
automobiles providing an automobile for
the first time in calendar year 2005 for
the personal use of any employee for an
entire year may determine the value of
the personal use by using the fleet-aver-
age valuation rule in regulations section
1.61–21(d)(5)(v) to calculate the Annual
Lease Values of the automobiles in the
fleet. The fleet-average valuation rule
may not be used to determine the Annual
Lease Value of any automobile if its fair
market value on the date it is first made
available exceeds $19,600 for a passenger
automobile other than a truck or van, or
$21,300 for a truck or van. If all other
applicable requirements are met, an em-
ployer with a fleet of 20 or more vehicles
consisting of passenger automobiles other
than trucks or vans as well as trucks and
vans may use the fleet-average valuation
rule as long as none exceeds its respec-
tive maximum allowable value. If the fair
market value of any passenger automo-
bile in the fleet exceeds these amounts,
the employer may determine the value of
the personal use under regulations sec-
tion 1.61–21(f) (Commuting valuation)
or the general valuation rules of section
1.61–21(b), or may determine the Annual
Lease Value of such automobile separately
under the automobile lease valuation rule
of section 1.61–21(d)(2) if the applicable
requirements are met.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure applies to em-
ployer-provided passenger automobiles,
trucks or vans first made available to em-
ployees for personal use in calendar year
2005.
SECTION 5. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Frederick L. Wesner of the
Office of Division Counsel/Associate
Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Govern-
ment Entities). For further information
regarding this revenue procedure, contact
Frederick L. Wesner at (202) 622–6040
(not a toll-free call).
26 CFR 1.6050S–1: Information reporting for quali-
fied tuition and related expenses.
Rev. Proc. 2005–50
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
This revenue procedure prescribes how
an eligible educational institution may
obtain automatic consent from the Service
to change its method of reporting under
section 6050S of the Code and section
1.6050S–1 of the Income Tax Regula-
tions. An eligible educational institution
that complies with all of the conditions
and procedures of this revenue proce-
dure has obtained consent to change its
method of reporting as required by section
1.6050S–1(b)(1).
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
In general, section 6050S requires any
eligible educational institution (as defined
in section 25A(f)(2)) to file information re-
turns and to furnish information statements
to assist students and the Service in de-
termining the amount of qualified tuition
and related expenses (qualified expenses)
for which an education tax credit is allow-
able under section 25A (as well as other tax
benefits for higher education expenses).
For calendar years beginning after Decem-
ber 31, 2003, an eligible educational insti-
tution must elect to report either the ag-
gregate amount of payments received, or
the aggregate amount billed, for qualified
expenses during the calendar year for stu-
dents enrolled for any academic period.
Section 1.6050S–1(b)(1) of the regulations
provides that once an eligible educational
institution elects to report either amounts
billed, or payments received, it must con-
tinue to use the same method of reporting
for all subsequent calendar years for which
it is required to file information returns,
and furnish information statements, unless
permission is granted to change its report-
ing method.
Section 25A(f)(2) of the Code defines
an “eligible educational institution” to
mean an institution: (1) that is described
in 20 U.S.C. 1088 of the Higher Educa-
tion Act of 1965 (Education Act) as in
effect on the date of enactment of section
25A (August 5, 1997); and (2) that is el-
igible to participate in federal financial
aid programs described in Title IV of the
Education Act. As of August 5, 1997, 20
U.S.C. 1088(a)(1) generally defined an
“institution of higher education” as: (1) an
accredited postsecondary educational in-
stitution (as defined in 20 U.S.C. 1141(a)
(a public or nonprofit institution of higher
education)); (2) a proprietary institution of
higher education; and (3) a postsecondary
vocational institution.
To establish eligibility to participate in
financial aid programs under the Educa-
tion Act, an institution generally must ap-
ply to the Secretary of Education for a de-
termination that it qualifies as an eligible
institution, and may request a certification
that it is eligible to participate in finan-
cial aid programs under Title IV. See 34
C.F.R. 600.20(a). If the Secretary of Ed-
ucation determines that the entire appli-
cant institution, including all its locations
and all its educational programs, satisfies
the applicable requirements, then the eli-
gibility determination extends to all educa-
tional programs and locations identified on
the institution’s application. See 34 C.F.R.
600.10(b)(1). If, however, only certain ed-
ucational programs or locations satisfy the
applicable requirements, then the eligibil-
August 8, 20052722005–32 I.R.B.

ity determination extends only to those ed-
ucational programs and locations as iden-
tified by the Secretary of Education. See
34 C.F.R. 600.10(b) (2); see also 34 C.F.R.
600.20(c).
The Secretary of Education issues an
eligibility determination at the institution
level, and the determination may extend
to some or all programs, locations, and
branch campuses of the institution. Simi-
larly, an “eligible educational institution”
for purposes of section 25A(f)(2) of the
Code is determined at the institution level
and the “eligible educational institution”
mayextendtosomeorallprograms,loca-
tions, and branch campuses of the institu-
tion consistent with the Secretary of Edu-
cation’s eligibility determination.
SECTION 3. CONDITIONS FOR
AUTOMATIC CONSENT
For section 6050S purposes, the eligi-
ble educational institution at the institu-
tion level must elect one method of report-
ing, and the method extends to all locations
and branch campuses of the institution to
which the Secretary of Education’s eligi-
bility determination extends. Therefore, if
an eligible educational institution changes
its reporting method under this revenue
procedure, all locations and branch cam-
puses of the institution to which the el-
igibility determination extends must use
the method to which the eligible educa-
tional institution changes (new method),
beginning with the calendar year for which
the change in reporting method is effec-
tive (year of change). Because the Ser-
vice has not previously announced in pub-
lished guidance that locations and branch
campuses of an eligible educational insti-
tution to which the eligibility determina-
tion extends must use the same method of
reporting, the Service will not require lo-
cations or branch campuses of an eligible
educational institution that elected (before
the effective date of this revenue proce-
dure) to use different methods of reporting
to change to the same method of reporting.
If, however, an eligible educational institu-
tion changes its method of reporting under
this revenue procedure, then all locations
and branch campuses of the eligible edu-
cational institution to which the eligibil-
ity determination extends not already us-
ing the new method of reporting must also
change to the new method of reporting un-
der this revenue procedure, beginning with
the year of the change.
An eligible educational institution may
not change its method of reporting more
frequently than onceevery five years un-
der this revenue procedure, except upon
a showing of extraordinary circumstances,
such as significant hardship to the eligible
educational institution.
An eligible educational institution, in-
cluding all its locations and branch cam-
puses to which the eligibility determina-
tion extends, must include a notification
of the change in reporting method to the
students with, or on, the information state-
ments required to be furnished to the stu-
dents for the year of the change.
SECTION 4. AUTOMATIC CONSENT
PROCEDURES
An eligible educational institution must
notify the Service of its change in reporting
method under this revenue procedure by
submitting a written statement to:
Internal Revenue Service
Enterprise Computing Center —
Martinsburg (ECC—MTB)
Information Reporting Program
230 Murall Drive
Kearneysville, WV 25430
The written statement must be filed no
later than three months before the due date
of the information returns for the year of
thechange.TheService will not acknowl-
edge receipt of a written statement submit-
ted under this revenue procedure.
The written statement must include a
prominent reference to this revenue proce-
dure and must contain the following infor-
mation:
1. The eligible educational institution’s
name and Employer Identification Num-
ber (EIN);
2. All locations and branch campuses
included in the eligible educational insti-
tution (and their EINs);
3. The method of reporting under sec-
tion 6050S and the regulations to which
the eligible educational institution, includ-
ing all its locations and branch campuses,
is changing;
4. The calendar year for which the
change in reporting is effective;
5. A statement as to whether the eligi-
ble educational institution, or any of its lo-
cations and branch campuses, has changed
its method of reporting within the four year
period preceding the year of the change,
and if so: (a) the calendar year of the pre-
vious change, and (b) an explanation of ex-
traordinary circumstances.
The written statement must be signed by
an officer of the eligible educational in-
stitution authorized to sign tax returns.
The written request must be signed under
penalties of perjury that, to the best of the
person’s knowledge and belief, the infor-
mation contained in the statement is true,
correct, and complete.
SECTION 5. AUTOMATIC CONSENT
Pursuant to section 1.6050S–1(b)(1) of
the regulations, the consent of the Service
is granted to an eligible educational institu-
tion, including all its locations and branch
campuses to which the eligibility determi-
nation extends, to change its method of re-
porting under section 6050S and the reg-
ulations for the calendar year in which the
institution timely submits the written state-
ment required by section 4 of this rev-
enue procedure. This consent is granted
only if the eligible educational institution
complies with all the conditions and pro-
cedures of this revenue procedure.
If the Service determines that the eli-
gible educational institution has not com-
plied with the conditions and procedures
of this revenue procedure (for example,
the eligible educational institution has not
demonstrated extraordinary circumstances
for changing a method of reporting within
5 years of a previous change in reporting
method), the Service will notify the eli-
gible educational institution that consent
to change its method of reporting under
section 6050S and the regulations for the
specified calendar year is not granted.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective
August 8, 2005.
SECTION 7. PAPERWORK
REDUCTION ACT
The collection of information con-
tained in this revenue procedure has been
reviewed and approved by the Office
of Management and Budget in accor-
dance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
2005–32 I.R.B.273August 8, 2005

(44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number
1545–1952.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a valid
OMB control number.
The collection of information in this
revenue procedure is in section 4. The in-
formation is required in order for an eli-
gible educational institution to obtain per-
mission to change its reporting method un-
der section 6050S and the regulations. The
collection of information is voluntary to
obtain a benefit. The likely respondents
are nonprofit institutions.
The estimated total annual recordkeep-
ing and reporting burden is 300 hours.
The estimated annual recordkeeping
and reporting burden per respondent is 10
hours. The estimated number of annual
respondents is 30.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained so long as
their contents may become material in ad-
ministration of any internal revenue law.
Generally, tax returns and return informa-
tion are confidential, as required by section
6103.
SECTION 8. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Donna Welch of the Of-
fice of Associate Chief Counsel, Proce-
dure and Administration (Administrative
Provisions and Judicial Practice). For
further information regarding this rev-
enue procedure, contact Donna Welch at
202–622–4910 (not a toll-free call); and
for further information regarding sub-
mitting a change, contact the Enterprise
Computing Center, Information Report-
ing Program Customer Service Section at
1–866–455–7438 (a toll-free call).
August 8, 20052742005–32 I.R.B.

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving
Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents,
and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures,
Disbarments, and Resignations
Announcement 2005-48
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries may not accept assistance from,
or assist, any person who is under disbar-
ment or suspension from practice before
the Internal Revenue Service if the assis-
tance relates to a matter constituting prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service
and may not knowingly aid or abet another
person to practice before the Internal Rev-
enue Service during a period of suspen-
sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such
other person.
To enable attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries to identify persons to whom
these restrictions apply, the Director, Of-
fice of Professional Responsibility, will
announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
their names, their city and state, their pro-
fessional designation, the effective date
of disciplinary action, and the period of
suspension. This announcement will ap-
pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest
practicable date after such action and will
continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins
for five successive weeks.
Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid institution or con-
clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis-
barment or suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of-
fer his or her consent to suspension from
such practice. The Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, in his discretion,
may suspend an attorney, certified public
accountant, enrolled agent or enrolled ac-
tuary in accordance with the consent of-
fered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent suspension from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Harrison, John S.Oakland, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
January 25, 2005
Newkirk, StephonWinterville, NCCPAIndefinite
from
February 8, 2005
Goldman, Mark L.East Meadow, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
February 18, 2005
Johnston, H. JamesKnoxville, TNCPAIndefinite
from
March 16, 2005
Gapp, Edward J.Greenwich, CTCPAIndefinite
from
March 28, 2005
2005–32 I.R.B.275August 8, 2005

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Rowland, Mark C.Westlake, OHCPAIndefinite
from
April 11, 2005
French Jr., Paul C.Bangor, MICPAIndefinite
from
April 25, 2005
Mynsberge, Richard C.Mishawaka, INCPAIndefinite
from
May 1, 2005
Specht Jr., Henry F.N. Myrtle Beach, SCCPAIndefinite
from
May 1, 2005
Sostarich, Mark E.S. Milwaukee, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 1, 2005
Gasa, William M.Winfield, ILEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
June 1, 2005
Leisure, Sally R.Portland, ORAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Tuerk Jr., Carl E.Annapolis, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
July 1, 2005
Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, is authorized to
immediately suspend from practice before
the Internal RevenueService any practi-
tioner who, within five years from the date
the expedited proceeding is instituted (1)
has had a license to practice as an attor-
ney, certified public accountant, or actuary
suspended or revoked for cause or (2) has
been convicted of certain crimes.
The following individuals have been
placed under suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service by virtue
of the expedited proceeding provisions:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Hawkins, Nicholas G.Harrods Creek, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
February 11, 2005
Richey, Michael L.Girardeau, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
February 11, 2005
Brown, Calvin D.Dallas, TXCPAIndefinite
from
February 16, 2005
August 8, 20052762005–32 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Bell, James M.Bandera, TXCPAIndefinite
from
February 23, 2005
Fedynshyn, Michael P.Broomfield, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
February 23, 2005
Harris, RossPikeville, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
February 23, 2005
Tehin Jr., NikolaiSan Francisco, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 7, 2005
Ballance, Frank W.Warrenton, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 7, 2005
Jacob, Arthur F.Sykesville, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Hefley, Lee D.Burleson, TXCPAIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Beswick, Robert H.Encino, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Scarpello, Joseph R.Tustin, CACPAIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Machado, Lazaro J.Santa Ana, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
McKnew, Donna K.Ashland, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Yarno Jr., WilliamLafayette, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Walker, Frank O.Bay City, TXCPAIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Kafkas, Demetrios G.Tewksbury, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Scott, Bertram A.Brooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
2005–32 I.R.B.277August 8, 2005

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Templeton, Robert L.Ashland, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Christopher, Nathan H.Salisbury, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Willingham, Nathaniel J.Jacksonville, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Anderson, Brett I.Des Moines, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 8, 2005
Broderick, Thomas F.Somerville, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 14, 2005
Peoples, Brendan K.Ft. Worth, TXCPAIndefinite
from
March 15, 2005
Tidmore, J. ToddAddison, TXCPAIndefinite
from
March 15, 2005
Cox, Patricia A.Victoria, TXCPAIndefinite
from
March 15, 2005
Rogers, FredMansfield, LACPAIndefinite
from
March 15, 2005
Bridgeforth, WyvonniaOak Park, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 15, 2005
Bruce, Donna M.Athens, ALCPAIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Teske, David S.Seattle, WAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Cobb Jr., Wayne H.Kaufman, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Swindell IV, Lewis H.Avondale, AZAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Murr, Mark D.Houston, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Nip, Raymond A.C.Honolulu, HICPAIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
August 8, 20052782005–32 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Asbury, Lloyd T.Jacksonville, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Lowell, Melinda E.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 18, 2005
Rub, Lawrence P.Glenwood, MDCPAIndefinite
from
March, 18, 2005
Fagan, Charles G.Severna Park, MDCPAIndefinite
from
March 21, 2005
Lewis, Larry L.Woodbridge, VAAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 28, 2005
Mpi, Afoma M.Peoria, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
March 30, 2005
Gross, Hyath B.Schenectady, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 1, 2005
Zick, Terry T.Wrightville Beach, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 1, 2005
Atlas, Joan M.Philadelphia, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 4, 2005
Rider, Lawrence C.Boulder, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 5, 2005
Eller, Scott D.Frisco, TXCPAIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
Brenton, Robert O.Overland Park, KSCPAIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
Folks, Lloyd C.Kinston, NCCPAIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
Suckling, John R.San Marcos, CACPAIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
Pulito, James P.Phoenix, AZCPAIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
Garcia, Felix D.Auroa, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 6, 2005
2005–32 I.R.B.279August 8, 2005

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Wentzel, Gerald L.Bloomingdale, ILCPAIndefinite
from
April 14, 2005
Williams, David W.Simpsonville, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Sykes III, Bernard G.Riviera Beach, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Hambrick Jr., J. C.Branson, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Adams, David M.Charleston, SCAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Richardson, Jon M.Danville, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Rose, Shaun H.Baltimore, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Tanner, Fred L.Bowling Green, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Perry, David W.Reading, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Fleming, Bruce D.Council Bluffs, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Healy, Paul J.Pembroke, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Kaczynski, Ronald C.Andover, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 19, 2005
Whalley, Lester F.Yorba Linda, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 27, 2005
Tanner, MaxLas Vegas, NVAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2005
Blackwell, Johnny L.Fayetteville, NCCPAIndefinite
from
May 3, 2005
Szer, StevenFort Mill, SCCPAIndefinite
from
May 3, 2005
August 8, 20052802005–32 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Chinn, David P.Louisville, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 9, 2005
Bille, Anthony J.Hopkinton, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2005
Dotson, Lewis S.Mattoon, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2005
Palmer, Philip B.Chubbuck, IDAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2005
Wolterbeek, Mark E.Rindge, NHAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 31, 2005
James III., Charles M.Cheverly, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 31, 2005
Jorgensen, Allen C.Redlands, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 2, 2005
Brisbon, Brenda C.Baltimore, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Gilroy, John M.Waterloo, NEAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Relphorde, Colin B.Homewood, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Pomeroy, John S.Dedham, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Gonick, Richard S.Ipswich, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Curran, Martin J.Manchester, NHAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Koenigsdorf, Keith B.Overland Park, KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
Jambor, Daniel F.St. Paul, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
LaFont Jr., Henry J.Lockport, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 7, 2005
2005–32 I.R.B.281August 8, 2005

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Janosik, Dennis M.Parma, OHCPAIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Carter, Evalyn R.Calera, OKCPAIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Chasnoff, JoelGaithersburg, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
O’Keefe, Michael E.Oak Park, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Wilkes, Richard C.Bowbells, NDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Rogers, Reginald J.Bowie, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Hindley, Charles T.Colton, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Morgan, Wendy B.Scotts Valley, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 9, 2005
Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, after notice and an op-
portunity for a proceeding before an ad-
ministrative law judge, the following indi-
viduals have been placed under suspension
from practice before the Internal Revenue
Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Cahill, GaryShelton, CTAttorneyJanuary 27, 2005
to
January 26, 2008
Banks, Jean R.Van Nuys, CAEnrolled AgentMarch 8, 2005
to
December 7, 2006
August 8, 20052822005–32 I.R.B.

Censure Issued by Consent
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding
being instituted or continued, an attorney,
certified public accountant, enrolled agent,
or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her
consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen-
sure is a public reprimand.
The following individuals have con-
sented to the issuance of a Censure:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Borden KathleenBluffton, SCAttorneyMay 11, 2005
Williamson, DebraLong Beach, CACPAJune 3, 2005
Penalty Relief Under Section
6715
Announcement 2005–51
The Internal Revenue Service will not
assert the penalty under § 6715 of the In-
ternal Revenue Code with respect to dyed
diesel fuel that, due to shortages of undyed
diesel fuel in Florida counties located west
of the Apalachicola River caused by Hurri-
cane Dennis, has been sold for use or used
for highway use in those counties. This re-
lief from the § 6715 penalty will apply only
to dyed diesel fuel that is sold for use or
used for highway use in the Florida coun-
ties located west of the Apalachicola River
during the period July 8, 2005, through
July 18, 2005. This penalty relief is avail-
able to any person that sells or uses the
dyed fuel for highway use. In the case of
the operator of the vehicle in which the
dyed fuel is used, however, the relief is
available only if the operator or the per-
son selling the fuel to the operator pays the
$.244 per gallon tax on the dyed fuel. The
return and payment will be due on October
31, 2005, and the Service will not assert
penalties for failure to make semimonthly
deposits of the tax. See Publication 510,
Excise Taxes for 2005, for information on
the proper method for reporting and pay-
ing this tax.
The principal author of this announce-
mentisCeliaGabryshoftheOfficeofthe
Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs &
Special Industries). For further informa-
tion regarding this announcement, contact
Ms. Gabrysh at (202) 622–3130 (not a
toll-free call).
Deletions From Cumulative
List of Organizations
Contributions to Which
are Deductible Under Section
170 of the Code
Announcement 2005–54
The names of organizations that no
longer qualify as organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code of 1986 are listed below.
Generally, the Service will not disallow
deductions for contributions made to a
listed organization on or before the date
of announcement in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin that an organization no longer
qualifies. However, the Service is not
precluded from disallowing a deduction
for any contributions made after an or-
ganization ceases to qualify under section
170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under
section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had
knowledge of the revocation of the ruling
or determination letter, (2) was aware that
such revocation was imminent, or (3) was
in part responsible for or was aware of the
activities or omissions of the organization
that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declara-
tory judgment has been timely filed, con-
tributions from individuals and organiza-
tions described in section 170(c)(2) that
are otherwise allowable will continue to
be deductible. Protection under section
7428(c) would begin on August 8, 2005,
and would end on the date the court first
determines that the organization is not de-
scribed in section 170(c)(2) as more partic-
ularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For
individual contributors, the maximum de-
duction protected is $1,000, with a hus-
band and wife treated as one contributor.
This benefit is not extended to any indi-
vidual, in whole or in part, for the acts or
omissions of the organization that were the
basis for revocation.
American Islamic College, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Athena Sports,
Arvada, CO
National Consumer Council, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV
National Consumer Council, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Northern Services Group, Inc.
Monsey, NY
Project Homestead, Inc.
High Point, NC
University of Baltimore
Athletic Foundation, Inc.
Baltimore, MD
2005–32 I.R.B.283August 8, 2005

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
August 8, 2005i2005–32 I.R.B.

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–32
Announcements:
2005-46, 2005-27 I.R.B.63
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
2005-48, 2005-29 I.R.B.111
2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
2005-51, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
2005-54, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
Notices:
2005-48, 2005-27 I.R.B.9
2005-49, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-50, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-51, 2005-28 I.R.B.74
2005-52, 2005-28 I.R.B.75
2005-53, 2005-32 I.R.B.263
2005-54, 2005-30 I.R.B.127
2005-55, 2005-32 I.R.B.265
2005-56, 2005-32 I.R.B.266
2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
Proposed Regulations:
REG-130241-04, 2005-27 I.R.B.18
Revenue Procedures:
2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
2005-36, 2005-28 I.R.B.78
2005-37, 2005-28 I.R.B.79
2005-38, 2005-28 I.R.B.81
2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.271
2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
2005-50, 2005-32 I.R.B.272
Revenue Rulings:
2005-38, 2005-27 I.R.B.6
2005-39, 2005-27 I.R.B.1
2005-40, 2005-27 I.R.B.4
2005-41, 2005-28 I.R.B.69
2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.87
Revenue Rulings— Continued:
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.123
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.120
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.261
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.259
2005-49, 2005-30 I.R.B.125
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.124
2005-51, 2005-31 I.R.B.163
Tax Conventions:
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
Treasury Decisions:
9208, 2005-31 I.R.B.157
9209, 2005-31 I.R.B.153
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
2005–32 I.R.B.iiAugust 8, 2005

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–32
Notices:
2005-51
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
Revenue Procedures:
64-54
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
66-33
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
69-13
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
70-8
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
71-1
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
72-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
87-8
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
87-9
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
90–11
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
93-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
98-18
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
2000-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2001-16
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
Rev. Proc. 2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
Rev. Proc. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
Rev. Proc. 2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2004-50
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
Revenue Rulings:
65-109
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
68-549
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
82-29
Modified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-41
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
Treasury Decisions:
9186
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
9206
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
9207
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
August 8, 2005iii2005–32 I.R.B.
*U.S. Government Printing Office: 2005—314–048/20017