rr-03-79.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

Part I

Section 355--Distribution of stock and securities of a controlled corporation
(Also: §§ 368(a)(1)(D), 368(a)(1)(C) and 1.368-2)

Rev. Rul. 2003-79

ISSUE
Whether the acquisition by an unrelated corporation of all the assets of a newly
formed controlled corporation following the distribution of the stock of the controlled
corporation by a distributing corporation will satisfy the requirement of ' 368(a)(1)(C) of
the Internal Revenue Code that substantially all of the properties of the acquired
corporation be acquired where the assets of the controlled corporation represent less
than substantially all of the assets that the distributing corporation held before it formed
the controlled corporation.
FACTS
D, a domestic corporation, directly conducts Business X and Business Y. D=s
assets are equally divided between the two businesses. A, a domestic corporation
unrelated to D, conducts Business X and wishes to acquire D's Business X, but not D's
Business Y.

To accomplish the acquisition, D and A agree to undertake the following steps in

2
the following order: (i) D will transfer its Business X assets to C, a newly formed
domestic corporation, in exchange for 100 percent of the stock of C, (ii) D will distribute
the C stock to D’s shareholders, (iii) A will acquire all the assets of C in exchange solely
for voting stock of A, and (iv) C will liquidate. Apart from the question of whether the
acquisition of C’s assets by A will satisfy the requirement of ' 368(a)(1)(C) that the
acquiring corporation acquire substantially all of the properties of the acquired
corporation, steps (i) and (ii) together meet all the requirements of ' 368(a)(1)(D), step
(ii) meets all the requirements of ' 355(a), and steps (iii) and (iv) together meet all the
requirements of ' 368(a)(1)(C).
LAW
Section 355 provides that if certain requirements are met, a corporation may
distribute stock and securities in a controlled corporation to its shareholders and
security holders without causing the distributees to recognize gain or loss.
Section 368(a)(1)(C) defines a reorganization to include the acquisition by one
corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock, of substantially all of
the properties of another corporation.
Section 368(a)(1)(D) defines a reorganization to include a transfer by a
corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the
transfer the transferor, or one or more of its shareholders (including persons who were
shareholders immediately before the transfer), or any combination thereof, is in control
of the corporation to which the assets are transferred; but only if, in pursuance of the
plan, stock or securities of the corporation to which the assets are transferred are
distributed in a transaction that qualifies under ' 354, 355, or 356.

3
In Helvering v. Elkhorn Coal Co., 95 F.2d 732 (4
th
Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 305
U.S. 605, reh=g denied
, 305 U.S. 670 (1938), Elkhorn Coal, in anticipation of being
acquired by Mill Creek, transferred part of its operating assets to a newly formed
subsidiary and distributed the subsidiary=s stock to Elkhorn Coal’s shareholders. The
court concluded that the distribution of subsidiary stock prevented the subsequent
acquisition from qualifying under a predecessor of ' 368(a)(1)(C) because, as a result of
the distribution, Mill Creek did not acquire substantially all of Elkhorn Coal’s historical
assets.
In Commissioner v. Mary Archer W. Morris Trust, 367 F.2d 794 (4th Cir. 1966),
aff'g 42 T.C. 779 (1964), the taxpayer, in anticipation of a merger with a national bank,
contributed its insurance business to a new subsidiary and distributed the subsidiary=s
stock to its shareholders. The divestiture was necessary to comply with national
banking laws. The court held that the distribution satisfied the requirements for
nonrecognition under ' 355(a) and, therefore, that the contribution qualified as a
reorganization under ' 368(a)(1)(D).
In Rev. Rul. 68-603, 1968-2 C.B. 148, the Internal Revenue Service announced
that it would follow the decision in Mary Archer W. Morris Trust
to the extent it held that
(1) the active business requirements of ' 355(b)(1)(A) were satisfied even though the
distributing corporation, immediately after the spin-off, merged into the unrelated
acquiring corporation, (2) the control immediately after requirement of ' 368(a)(1)(D)
implies no limitation upon a reorganization of the transferor corporation (the distributing
corporation) after the distribution of the stock of the controlled corporation, and (3) there
was a business purpose for the spin-off and the merger.

4
Rev. Rul. 98-27, 1998-1 C.B. 1159, states that the Service will not apply any
formulation of the step transaction doctrine to determine whether the distributed
corporation was a controlled corporation immediately before a distribution under
' 355(a) solely because of any post-distribution acquisition or restructuring of the
distributed corporation, whether prearranged or not. The holding of Rev. Rul. 98-27 is
based on § 1012(a) and §1012(c) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (the “1997 Act”),
Pub. L. No. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788, 916-17. Section 1012(c) amended the control
requirements of '' 368(a)(1)(D) and 351 to provide that, generally for transactions
seeking qualification after August 5, 1997, under either provision and ' 355, the
shareholders of the distributing corporation must own stock possessing more than 50
percent of the voting power and more than 50 percent of the total value of the controlled
corporation's stock immediately after the distribution. See
§§ 368(a)(2)(H) and 351(c).
Section 1012(a) amended ' 355 by adding subsection (e), which provides rules for the
recognition of gain on certain distributions of stock or securities of a controlled
corporation in connection with acquisitions of stock representing a 50 percent or greater
interest in the distributing corporation or any controlled corporation.
The Conference Report accompanying the 1997 Act states, in part, that:
The . . . bill does not change the present-law requirement under section
355 that the distributing corporation must distribute 80 percent of the
voting power and 80 percent of each other class of stock of the controlled
corporation. It is expected that this requirement will be applied by the
Internal Revenue Service taking account of the provisions of the proposal
regarding plans that permit certain types of planned restructuring of the

5
distributing corporation following the distribution, and to treat similar
restructurings of the controlled corporation in a similar manner. Thus, the
80-percent control requirement is expected to be administered in a
manner that would prevent the tax-free spin-off of a less-than-80-percent
controlled subsidiary, but would not generally impose additional
restrictions on post-distribution restructurings of the controlled corporation
if such restrictions would not apply to the distributing corporation.
H.R. Rep. No. 105-220, at 529-30 (1997); 1997-4 C.B. 1457, at 1999-2000.
Section 6010(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act
of 1998 (the A1998 Act@), P.L. 105-206, 1998-3 C.B. 145, amended ' 1012(c) of the
1997 Act to provide that, in the case of a ' 368(a)(1)(D) or ' 351 transaction that is
followed by a ' 355 transaction, solely for purposes of determining the tax treatment of
any transfer of property by the distributing corporation to the controlled corporation, the
fact that the shareholders of the distributing corporation dispose of part or all of the
controlled corporation's stock after the ' 355 distribution shall not be taken into account
in determining whether the control requirement of either ' 368(a)(1)(D) or ' 351 has
been satisfied.

The Senate Report accompanying the 1998 Act contains three examples in which
distributing corporation D transfers appreciated business X to newly created subsidiary
C in exchange for at least 85 percent of the C stock and then distributes its C stock to
the D shareholders. As part of the same plan, C then merges into unrelated acquiring
corporation A. Each example concludes that if the distribution satisfies the

6
requirements of ' 355, the control immediately after requirement will be satisfied solely
for purposes of determining the tax treatment of the transfer of business X by D to C.
See
S. Rep. No. 105-174, at 173-176 (1998); 1998-3 C.B. 537, at 709-712.
ANALYSIS
Section 1012 of the 1997 Act, as amended by ' 6010(c) of the 1998 Act,
evidences the intention of Congress that a corporation formed in connection with a
distribution that qualifies for nonrecognition under ' 355 will be respected as a separate
corporation for purposes of determining (i) whether the corporation was a controlled
corporation immediately before the distribution and (ii) whether a pre-distribution
transfer of property to the controlled corporation satisfies the requirements of '
368(a)(1)(D) or ' 351, even if a post-distribution restructuring causes the controlled
corporation to cease to exist. See
Rev. Rul. 98-44, 1998-2 C.B. 315; Rev. Rul. 98-27,
supra; S. Rep. No. 105-174, supra. Therefore, the controlled corporation should also be
considered independently from the distributing corporation in determining whether an
acquisition of the controlled corporation will qualify as a reorganization under ' 368.
Accordingly, in determining under ' 368(a)(1)(C) whether an acquiring corporation has
acquired substantially all of the properties of a newly formed controlled corporation,
reference should be made solely to the properties held by the controlled corporation
immediately following the distributing corporation’s transfer of properties to the
controlled corporation, rather than to the properties held by the distributing corporation
immediately before its formation of the controlled corporation.
Hence, the acquisition by A of all the properties held by C immediately after the
distribution will satisfy the requirement of ' 368(a)(1)(C) that A acquire substantially all

7
the properties of C. This result obtains even though an acquisition by A of the same
properties from D would have failed this requirement if D had retained Business X,
contributed Business Y to C, and distributed the stock of C. See
Helvering v. Elkhorn
Coal Co., supra.
HOLDING
The acquisition by an unrelated corporation of all the assets of a newly formed
controlled corporation following the distribution of the stock of the controlled corporation
by a distributing corporation will satisfy the requirement of ' 368(a)(1)(C) that
substantially all of the properties of the acquired corporation be acquired where the
assets of the controlled corporation represent less than substantially all of the assets
that the distributing corporation held before it formed the controlled corporation.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Gene Raineri of the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). For further information regarding this revenue
ruling, please contact Mr. Raineri at (202) 622-7530 (not a toll-free call).