Note of Receipt of Note, Protocol Amending Convention… US and Sweden Taxes on Income, September 30, 2005

Her Excellency
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State of the
United States of America.

Excellency:

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of September 30, 2005 which reads
as follows:

I have the honor to refer to the Protocol Amending the Convention between the Government
of the United States of America and the Government of Sweden for the Avoidance of Double
Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, which was
signed today, and to confirm, on behalf of the Government of the United States of America,
the following understandings reached between our two Governments.

1. With reference to clause ii) of subparagraph e) of paragraph 2 of Article 17 (Limitation on
Benefits) of the Convention

It is understood that in applying clause ii) of subparagraph e) of paragraph 2 of Article 17
(Limitation on Benefits) in the case of Sweden the amount of a person’s deductible payments
and gross income for the taxable year shall be reduced by the amount of group contributions
paid to a Swedish resident or Swedish permanent establishment.

2. With reference to paragraph 6 of Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits) of the Convention

It is understood that in applying paragraph 6 of Article 17 (Limitation on Benefits), the legal
requirements for the facilitation of the free flow of capital and persons within the European
Union, together with the differing internal income tax systems, tax incentive regimes, and
existing tax treaty policies among member states of the European Union, will be considered.
Under that paragraph, the competent authority is instructed to consider as its guideline
whether the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of a company or the conduct of its
operations has or had as one of its principal purposes the obtaining of benefits under this
Convention. The competent authority may, therefore, determine, under a given set of facts,
that a change in circumstances that would cause a company to cease to qualify for treaty
benefits under paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 17 need not necessarily result in a denial of
benefits. Such changed circumstances may include a change in the state of residence of a
major shareholder of a company, the sale of part of the stock of a Swedish company to a
person resident in another member state of the European Union, or an expansion of a
company's activities in other member states of the European Union, all under ordinary
business conditions. The competent authority will consider these changed circumstances (in
addition to other relevant factors normally considered under paragraph 6 of Article 17) in
determining whether such a company will remain qualified for treaty benefits with respect to
income received from United States sources. If these changed circumstances are not
attributable to tax avoidance motives, this also will be considered by the competent authority
to be a factor weighing in favor of continued qualification under paragraph 6 of Article 17.

3. With reference to Article 26 (Exchange of Information) of the Convention

It is understood that the powers of each Contracting State's competent authorities to obtain
information include powers to obtain information held by financial institutions, nominees, or
persons acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity (not including information that would reveal
confidential communications between a client and an attorney, solicitor or other legal
representative, where the client seeks legal advice), and information relating to the ownership
of legal persons, and that each Contracting State's competent authority is able to exchange
such information in accordance with the Article.

If this is in accordance with your understanding, I would appreciate an acknowledgment from
you to that effect.

Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.”
I have the honor to confirm, on behalf of the Government of Sweden, that the references to
clause ii) of subparagraph e) of paragraph 2 of Article 17, paragraph 6 of Article 17 and
Article 26, as specified by you, is in accordance with our understanding.

Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.

Dated at Washintgon, D.C., September 2005

[Gunnar Lund]