Chapter 8 - Other Relevant Factors

In addition to the statutory minimum factors discussed in Chapter 5 and the factors discussed in Chapters 6 and 7, officers should also consider, in the totality of the circumstances, any other evidence in the record that is relevant to assessing the alien’s likelihood at any time of becoming a public charge.

A. Consideration of an Alien’s Willingness and Ability to Work and Employment

While many aliens may demonstrate their ability to work and earn income to meet their needs through their employment history or offers of future employment and associated salaries or wages, some aliens may have periods of unemployment. An officer may consider an alien’s employment history in the context of assessing the alien’s education and skills and assets, resources, and financial status. Like other factors and considerations, the fact that an alien is currently unemployed or has experienced a period of unemployment, by itself, is insufficient to conclude that an alien will become a public charge in the future. An officer may find it helpful to examine the arc of the alien’s education, training, employment history, and employment prospects to determine whether the alien has the necessary skills to reenter the workforce in the near term and earn income sufficient to meet his or her basic needs. An officer may request evidence of prospective employment, including job offers with estimated salary or wages.^[1] 

B. USCIS Fee Waivers

While USCIS does not collect information about previously received fee waivers on Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485), an officer may consider the request, receipt, or approval of an immigration benefit fee waiver in the totality of the circumstances.^[2] It is possible that some aliens applying for adjustment of status may have previously requested and received a fee waiver for a prior immigration benefit. In such a case, the officer considers this evidence in the totality of circumstances. The officer may account for when the fee waiver was granted, the amount of the fee waiver, and the grounds of eligibility for the fee waiver. If the fee waiver was received more recently, it is likely to be more relevant to the public charge inadmissibility determination.

As a general matter, the most common eligibility criteria for a fee waiver are receipt of a means-tested benefit or household income below 150 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG), both of which would already be evident in the alien’s responses to questions on Form I-485. If the alien requested the fee waiver on the basis of financial hardship, then the officer could request additional evidence on the nature and recency of such hardship in the totality of the circumstances.

C. Fee Exemptions

An officer may not consider a fee exemption as part of the determination of whether an alien is likely to become a public charge. A fee exemption has no bearing on whether an alien would likely become a public charge in the future. Fee exemptions are not synonymous with fee waivers. Fee exemptions are not generally requested by an alien based on an inability to pay. Instead, fee exemptions are approved by USCIS for specific forms or nonimmigrant or immigrant categories based on statutory authority, regulations, or agency policy.

D. Alien is a Child

The statute does not exempt children from the public charge ground of inadmissibility.^[3] When making a public charge inadmissibility determination for aliens who are children, USCIS must consider all of the required factors, may consider a sufficient Form I-864, and should consider all other relevant factors and information, including the current and/or past receipt of means-tested public benefits. As with any alien, USCIS considers the recency, amount, and duration of receipt of such benefits, the nature of the benefit, the reason for receipt, and whether that reason is likely to persist, when determining whether an alien child is likely at any time to become a public charge.

In the rare case that an alien child has received or is receiving means-tested public benefits, an officer may consider the financial contributions of a child’s household and the circumstances that resulted in the child’s receipt of such public benefits and the likelihood that those circumstances would continue in the future. The officer should also take into account whether the benefits received were due to temporary parental unemployment or other temporary circumstances.

E. Alien is a Primary Caregiver

Certain aliens may claim that they serve as primary caregivers within their households. Officers should consider an alien who is 18 years of age or older who has significant responsibility for actively caring for and managing the wellbeing of a child or an elderly, ill, or disabled person in the alien’s household to be a primary caregiver. Due to these responsibilities, some of these aliens may not be employed outside of the home. They also may lack current or recent employment history due to their unpaid role in their household. When considering whether an alien is serving as a primary caregiver, officers should generally find that only one person in a household can serve as the primary caregiver for an individual. If multiple caregivers share the care of a person in a given household, the officer should consider whether the alien has established that he or she has significant caregiving responsibilities that impact the alien's ability to be employed full-time. 

An officer may positively consider household contributions through primary caretaking responsibilities in the totality of the circumstances, because the officer may determine that the alien’s primary caretaking responsibilities outweigh any deficiencies related to the alien’s education and skills and lack of employment history or current employment. 

In determining whether the alien’s primary responsibilities are a positive factor in the totality of the circumstances, an officer could consider:

• Whether the person receiving the alien's care is a member of the alien's household;
• Whether other members of the household also claim to be the primary caregiver;
• Whether the person being cared for lives in the same residence as the alien;
• The age of the person being cared for; and
• The medical condition, including any disabilities, of the person being cared for.

Examples where an officer may attribute positive consideration of primary caregiving include:

• A parent who stays at home to care for a newborn child or child in school; and
• An adult son or daughter staying at home to care for his or her elderly parent.

Generally, a parent who has joint custody should have primary physical custody of the child in order to be considered a primary caregiver. If an alien is caring for an elderly parent, the alien may choose to provide evidence such as a certification from a doctor indicating the parent’s medical condition or copies of the parent’s medical record, and documentation of legal guardianship over the parent to help inform the officer’s inadmissibility determination.

An officer may consider other cases less favorably. For instance, an alien may indicate that he or she is the primary caregiver for his or her elderly in-laws, but the elderly parent is not living in the same residence as the alien and the alien’s spouse (their son or daughter). Instead, the alien is financially providing for the elderly parent’s room and board at a nursing home. In such a case, the alien’s responsibilities are financial and not something that would occupy a significant amount of their time or preclude the alien from being employed. In addition, there may be cases where two members of the same household claim to be the primary caregiver. If there is no documentation that establishes that the alien is the primary caregiver, then the officer should give less weight to the alien’s claims in the totality of the circumstances analysis. 

F. Alien is an Active-duty Servicemember or the Spouse or Child(ren) of an Active-duty Service member

Aliens must generally be LPRs to join the United States military and so active-duty U.S. servicemembers are unlikely to apply for adjustment of status.^[4] However, if they do apply for adjustment of status, they are not exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility based on their service.^[5]

As a consequence of the unique compensation and tax structure afforded by Congress for service members, it is common for active-duty servicemembers, as well as their spouses and children, to receive certain means-tested public benefits. If an active-duty servicemember, their spouse, or their child(ren) has received any means-tested public benefits, the officer may consider any evidence the alien provides regarding circumstances surrounding the duration, amount, and recency of receipt, and how the alien’s receipt may have been impacted by such military service. The officer may also consider any evidence the alien submits relating to skills he or she obtained through his or her military service.

When considering the receipt of any means-tested public benefits by an active-duty U.S. servicemember, their spouse, or their child(ren), officers may also consider, in the totality of the circumstances, the sacrifices of members of the armed forces, which are vital to the public’s safety and security. Officers may also consider that many of the aliens who enlist in the military are early in their careers, and therefore, consistent with statutory pay authorities, earn relatively low salaries that are supplemented by certain allowances and tax advantages. These salaries may increase over time and in turn decrease the likelihood that these aliens may require means-tested public benefits in the future.

G. Alien is a Victim of Crime, Domestic Violence, or Other Adverse Circumstances

An alien who has experienced crime, domestic violence, or other adverse circumstances may have received means-tested public benefits as a direct or indirect result of those circumstances.^[6] An officer may consider information or evidence that such an alien chooses to provide relating to the alien’s temporary circumstances that may be relevant to a public charge inadmissibility determination. The reasons why an alien received means-tested public benefits in the past, including these adverse circumstances, are relevant to an officer’s determination as to whether the alien is likely to become a public charge in the future.

Footnotes

[^ 1] See Matter of Martinez-Lopez, 10 I&N Dec. 409, 421 (BIA 1962; Att’y Gen. 1962) (considering whether the alien had an employment offer in making a public charge inadmissibility determination). For more information about the consideration of an alien’s totality of the circumstances, see Chapter 4, Prospective Determination Based on the Totality of the Circumstances [8 USCIS-PM G.4].

[^ 2] Officers should only consider such fee waivers in the totality of the circumstances for adjustment of status applications filed on or after February 24, 2020. Prior to that date, the public was not on notice that fee waivers might be considered in a public charge inadmissibility determination. 

[^ 3] See INA 212(a)(4)(A).

[^ 4] See the USA.gov Join the Military webpage. However, under the Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) program, certain aliens who were asylees, refugees, temporary protected status beneficiaries, deferred action beneficiaries, or nonimmigrants in certain categories could enlist. The then-U.S. Department of Defense ceased recruiting service members through the MAVNI program in 2016. While not relevant to the adjudication of adjustment of status applications by USCIS officers, LPRs who are active-duty service members may be subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility when returning to the United States. See Chapter 3, Applicability, Section A, Applicants for Admission, Subsection 3, Certain Lawful Permanent Residents Returning to the United States [8 USCIS-PM G.3(A)(3)].

[^ 5] See INA 212(a)(4)(A).

[^ 6] Some of these victims may be exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, depending on their circumstances. For a list of those exempted from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, see Chapter 3, Applicability [8 USCIS-PM G.3].