Question juridique clé
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42(1) and Art. 106(2) BGG
Solution extraite
No. The appellant merely restated her view of the facts and did not show which federal rights were violated by the cantonal non-entry and denial of legal aid.
Motifs extraits
The Federal Supreme Court reviews constitutional complaints only when specifically raised and properly substantiated. The submission lacked any legally sufficient challenge to the appealed decision.