Question juridique clé
Whether the subsidiary constitutional complaint met the pleading requirements for alleging constitutional violations.
Solution extraite
The complaint was inadmissible because it did not invoke any constitutional right and did not show, in the required manner, how the cantonal judgment violated such rights.
Motifs extraits
The appellant merely asserted that the claimed amount was due and criticized the judicial system; this does not satisfy Arts. 116, 117 and 106(2) LTF.