L'espace de travail IA pour les professionnels du droit
Essai gratuit de 14 jours (10 questions/jour pendant l'essai)
ATA/209/1998•LAMO coverage denied for lack of Geneva domicile
ATA/209/1998Cour de justice / Chambre administrative21 avr. 1998Inadmissible
Extrait par Omnilex
The Administrative Court held that the insured person no longer had domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC. As a result, she could not qualify for coverage under LAMO. The court therefore declared her appeal inadmissible.
Art. 23 CC; LAMO.22 al.5; domicile as a condition for LAMO coverage. Where the claimant no longer has domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC, the statutory condition for coverage is not met. In such a case, the appeal seeking the benefit of LAMO is inadmissible, as the absence of domicile excludes entitlement ab initio (consid. n.a.).
Descripteurs
ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; COUVERTURE; DEBITEUR; AFFECTION OCULAIRE; SEJOUR A L'HOPITAL; RESILIATION; PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; CONDITION DE RECEVABILITE; DOMICILE; ASSU
Normes
LAMO.22 al.5
Résumé
Le TA a déclaré irrecevable le recours déposé par une assurée, au motif que celle-ci n'était plus considérée comme domiciliée à Genève au sens de l'art. 23 CC. Elle ne pouvait dès lors en aucun cas être mise au bénéfice de la LAMO.
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether the appeal was admissible in light of the claimant’s domicile for LAMO purposes.
The claimant was not domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC and therefore could not be covered by LAMO; the appeal was inadmissible.
LAMO coverage was conditional on Geneva domicile. Since the claimant no longer met that domicile requirement, the substantive legal basis for coverage was absent, making the appeal incapable of success.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.