One-year domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid

ATA/95/1997Cour de justice / Chambre administrative4 févr. 1997Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The case concerns a request for maintenance advance aid under LARPA. The applicant had not been domiciled in the canton for the required one-year period. The court held that this domicile requirement is a mandatory condition of entitlement and therefore confirmed the refusal of the advance.

Regeste Omnilex

Art. 8 al. 1 LARPA; domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid: entitlement presupposes that the claimant has been domiciled in the canton for at least one year. Where this condition is not met, the request is inadmissible on the merits and must be rejected; no discretionary balancing can override the statutory threshold.

Texte intégral

Descripteurs

OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); DOMICILE; CREANCIER; IP

Normes

LARPA.8 al.1

Résumé

Le bénéficiaire d'une avance ne peut requérir l'aide du scarpa s'il est domicilié dans le canton depuis moins d'un an.

Mots-clés

maintenance advancedomicile requirementeligibilitysocial assistancecantonclaim rejection

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether a beneficiary domiciled in the canton for less than one year may claim a maintenance advance under Art. 8(1) LARPA.

Solution extraite

No. The one-year domicile requirement is a condition for entitlement, so the applicant cannot demand the advance before meeting it.

Motifs extraits

The court applied Art. 8(1) LARPA and treated the domicile period as a mandatory eligibility threshold for aid.

One-year domicile requirement for maintenance advance aidGénéré par IA