L'espace de travail IA pour les professionnels du droit

  • Recherche juridique avec accès à plus d'1 million de sources
  • Automatisation de documents
  • Gestion des dossiers
  • Hébergé dans l'UE et en Suisse

Essai gratuit de 14 jours (10 questions/jour pendant l'essai)

Essai gratuitVoir une démo

No cost advance for Lucerne public bodies

OG 1995 30Autre juridiction4 déc. 1995Other

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The decision states that, although cost advances may generally be required from plaintiffs, counterclaimants and private complainants under §§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO and 271 StPO, this practice is to be abandoned immediately for Lucerne public bodies within the meaning of § 1 VRG, except for expert opinion costs. Such bodies are to be billed only after the proceedings. If they succeed, they may recover those costs from the opposing party under § 18 KoG.

Regeste Omnilex

§§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO, 271 StPO; § 1 VRG; § 18 KoG; cost advances for public bodies: Lucerne public bodies are to be exempted from advance payment of court costs, save for expert opinion costs. The court distinguishes between advance payment and ultimate cost liability: while advances may ordinarily be demanded, public bodies are to be invoiced only after conclusion of the proceedings, with reimbursement claims against the opposing party arising upon success. The rule is justified by practice continuity with summary enforcement proceedings and applies immediately (consid. not stated).

Texte intégral

Entsprechend den §§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO und 271 StPO können vom Kläger, Widerkläger und Privatkläger Kostenvorschüsse einverlangt werden. Bei den luzernischen Gemeinwesen im Sinne von § 1 VRG ist indessen ab sofort auf die Einholung eines Kostenvorschusses (ausgenommen für Expertisenkosten) zu verzichten. Nach Abschluss des Verfahrens ist diesen Gemeinwesen - wie dies in den Rechtsöffnungsverfahren bereits üblich ist - aber Rechnung zu stellen. Sofern die Gemeinwesen obsiegen, haben sie dann gegenüber der Gegenpartei entsprechend § 18 KoG Anspruch auf Ersatz dieser Kosten.

Mots-clés

cost advancepublic bodiescourt costsexpert opinion costsreimbursementLucerne

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether Lucerne public bodies must provide a cost advance in proceedings under §§ 123 Abs. 1 ZPO and 271 StPO.

Solution extraite

As of immediately, no cost advance may be requested from Lucerne public bodies within the meaning of § 1 VRG, except for expert opinion costs.

Motifs extraits

Although cost advances may generally be requested from plaintiffs, counterclaimants, and private complainants, the specific practice for Lucerne public bodies is to dispense with such advances, while charging costs after the proceedings end.

Question juridique clé

How costs are to be handled if the public bodies prevail.

Solution extraite

After the proceedings, the public bodies are to be billed; if they prevail, they may claim reimbursement from the opposing party under § 18 KoG.

Motifs extraits

The court aligns the practice with existing summary enforcement proceedings: no advance payment, but subsequent billing and reimbursement upon success.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.