Whether the appeal met the statutory requirements of motivation and conclusions.
The appeal did not satisfy the mandatory requirements because the appellant neither specified the relief sought nor adequately challenged the contested decision within the set time limit.
Art. 61 let. b LPGA requires a brief statement of facts, reasons, and conclusions. The appellant was warned and given a deadline to cure the deficiency under cantonal procedural rules, but did not respond, so the defect remained uncured and the appeal was inadmissible.