L'espace de travail IA pour les professionnels du droit
Essai gratuit de 14 jours (10 questions/jour pendant l'essai)
BAG 8 AZR 979/07•Objection to transfer of undertaking; revision dismissed
BAG 8 AZR 979/07Bag / Division 822 avr. 2010Dismissed
Extrait par Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf in a case concerning an objection to a transfer of undertaking. The decision was rendered without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly waive the court's statement of facts and reasons, the appellate judgment may be issued accordingly. In revision proceedings, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the case in summary form; if the revision is unsuccessful, the appellant bears the costs. The waiver does not affect the binding force of the dispositive ruling; it concerns only the written reasons and factual recital.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-04-22
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 979/07
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Solingen, 19. April 2007, Az: 1 Ca 1431/06 lev, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf, 10. Oktober 2007, Az: 7 Sa 1069/07, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Betriebsübergang - Widerspruch - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 10. Oktober 2007 - 7 Sa 1069/07 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Pauli |
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed in a dispute over objection to a transfer of undertaking.
The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.
The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision; the decision was issued without findings of fact and reasons because the parties had waived them under the cited procedural provisions.
Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings?
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
The losing appellant bears the costs of the unsuccessful revision.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.