Revision dismissed in employment dispute; plaintiff bears costs

BAG 8 AZR 663/09Bag / Division 87 avr. 2011Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hamburg Landesarbeitsgericht. The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under the procedural provisions cited in the heading. The only operative consequences are dismissal of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the plaintiff.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in revision proceedings, the Federal Labour Court may issue a shortened judgment without full reasoning; the appeal is dismissed if the court upholds the lower-court result. The dispositive cost order follows the outcome of the revision and may place the costs on the unsuccessful appellant.

Texte intégral

BAG — 8 AZR 663/09, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-04-07

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 663/09

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hamburg, 23. Januar 2008, Az: 26 Ca 295/07, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg, 17. Juni 2009, Az: 3 Sa 8/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Hamburg vom 17. Juni 2009 - 3 Sa 8/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung des Senats vom 22. Oktober 2009 - 8 AZR 286/08 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
WarnkeMallmann

Mots-clés

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabour lawappeal dismissal

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the LAG Hamburg judgment should be allowed

Solution extraite

The revision was dismissed.

Motifs extraits

The dispositive part states that the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hamburg Regional Labour Court is rejected; no further reasons are set out because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons.

Question juridique clé

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings

Solution extraite

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Motifs extraits

The tenor expressly assigns the costs of the revision to the plaintiff.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.