L'espace de travail IA pour les professionnels du droit
Essai gratuit de 14 jours (10 questions/jour pendant l'essai)
BAG 6 AZR 6/12•Dismissal notice did not terminate employment contract
BAG 6 AZR 6/12Bag / 6e division13 déc. 2012Modified
Extrait par Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court decided a revision in an employment dismissal dispute. It set aside the Hessian Regional Labour Court's judgment of 31 October 2011 and, on the employee's appeal, amended the Frankfurt Labour Court's judgment. The court declared that the employment relationship was not terminated by the dismissal notice of 24 December 2009. Costs were allocated to the employer, except for the costs caused by the employee's default at the hearing on 20 June 2011, which the employee must bear. The judgment was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them.
§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in the judgment form. Where the parties waive facts and reasons, the court may issue an abbreviated judgment; the dispositive part remains fully effective, while the reasoning is omitted. In an employment dismissal dispute, the appellate and revisional court may, upon successful revision, set aside the judgment below and grant declaratory relief that the employment relationship was not terminated by the challenged notice; costs may be allocated so that default-caused costs remain with the party in default.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-12-13
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 6/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 8. September 2010, Az: 2 Ca 311/10, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 20. Juni 2011, Az: 17 Sa 1665/10, Versäumnisurteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 31. Oktober 2011, Az: 17 Sa 1665/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 31. Oktober 2011 - 17 Sa 1665/10 - aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Frankfurt am Main vom 8. September 2010 - 2 Ca 311/10 - abgeändert:
Es wird festgestellt, dass das zwischen den Parteien bestehende Arbeitsverhältnis durch die Kündigung vom 24. Dezember 2009 nicht aufgelöst worden ist.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .
| Fischermeier | Gallner | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schäferkord | Reiner Koch |
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether the employment relationship was terminated by the dismissal notice of 2009-12-24.
The dismissal did not end the employment relationship.
The Federal Labour Court set aside the appellate judgment and, on the employee's appeal, amended the first-instance judgment to declare the employment relationship continued; no further reasoning is provided because the parties waived findings and reasons.
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings, including the costs caused by the employee's default on 2011-06-20.
The employer bears the costs of the litigation, except for the costs caused by the employee's default at the hearing of 2011-06-20, which the employee must bear.
Costs were apportioned in accordance with the dispositive order; no detailed reasoning is provided in the abbreviated judgment.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.