Revision dismissed in employment dispute

BAG 10 AZR 865/11Bag / Division 1016 janv. 2013Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Labour Court, 10th Senate, rejected the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO, so the decision contains no substantive discussion. The defendant must bear the costs of the revision. The lower-court judgment therefore remains effective.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 313a ZPO; revision dismissed without written reasons where the parties have waived the statement of facts and reasons; the appellate judgment is left undisturbed and the costs of the revision are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Texte intégral

BAG — 10 AZR 865/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-01-16

Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 865/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 4. November 2010, Az: 3 Ca 10439/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 10. August 2011, Az: 18 Sa 97/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 10. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 10. August 2011 - 18 Sa 97/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf die Darstellung von Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründen verzichtet.

MikoschMestwerdtSchmitz-Scholemann
ThielStefan Fluri

Mots-clés

revisioncostsemployment disputewaiver of reasons

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the defendant's revision against the appellate judgment was well-founded

Solution extraite

The revision was unfounded and was rejected.

Motifs extraits

The decision contains no statement of reasons because the parties waived the presentation of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.