Revision dismissed; defendant state bears revision costs

BAG 9 AZR 754/12Bag / Division 915 oct. 2013Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the defendant state's revision against the judgment of the LAG Berlin-Brandenburg. The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons pursuant to section 313a(1) ZPO. The only express dispositive consequence, besides dismissal of the revision, is that the defendant state must bear the costs of the revision.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision by judgment without a full written reasoning. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the appellant bears the costs of the revision. The abbreviated form of judgment does not alter the binding force of the appellate judgment; it merely affects the scope of the written reasons (consid. not specified).

Texte intégral

BAG — 9 AZR 754/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15

Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 754/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 15. Dezember 2011, Az: 59 Ca 10955/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 22. Juni 2012, Az: 8 Sa 362/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des beklagten Landes gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 22. Juni 2012 - 8 Sa 362/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

BrühlerKrasshöferKlose
KranzuschM. Lücke

Mots-clés

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabour lawappellate review

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the defendant state's revision against the LAG Berlin-Brandenburg judgment should be allowed.

Solution extraite

The revision was dismissed and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Motifs extraits

The court rejected the revision; no further factual or legal reasoning is available because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under section 313a(1) ZPO.

Question juridique clé

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Solution extraite

The defendant state must bear the costs of the revision.

Motifs extraits

As the revision was unsuccessful, the costs were imposed on the appellant.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.