Revision dismissed in parallel labor case

BAG 4 AZR 211/13Bag / 4e division18 juin 2014Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG. Because the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons in light of parallel case 4 AZR 50/13, the Senate issued a short judgment. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons in a parallel case. If the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labor Court may dispense with a full written judgment and issue a shortened decision. The omission of the reasons does not affect the admissibility or disposition of the revision; the procedural consequence is limited to the form of the judgment. Costs follow the outcome of the unsuccessful revision.

Texte intégral

BAG — 4 AZR 211/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 211/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 176/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 375/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 375/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Mots-clés

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor court

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should succeed.

Solution extraite

The revision was unsuccessful and the appeal was dismissed.

Motifs extraits

The judgment was rendered without factual findings and reasons because, in light of the parallel proceeding, the parties had waived them under the applicable procedural rules.

Question juridique clé

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Solution extraite

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Motifs extraits

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.