Taxation of employer VBL contribution as wages

BVerfG 2 BvR 3056/09Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. Kammer27 juil. 2010Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The First Chamber of the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the constitutional complaint for decision. The complaint concerned a BFH judgment holding that an employer's contribution to the VBL constitutes taxable wages at the time of payment. The published decision contains no reasons beyond the citation to § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-acceptance of a constitutional complaint without reasons. A chamber may reject acceptance by unanonymized order without stating reasons where the statutory requirements for acceptance are not shown. Such a non-entry decision does not contain a substantive review of the challenged judgment and leaves it in force.

Texte intégral

BVerfG — 2 BvR 3056/09, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-27

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 3056/09

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100727.2bvr305609

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 7. Mai 2009, Az: VI R 8/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Umlagezahlung des Arbeitgebers an die Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder (VBL) als steuerpflichtiger Arbeitslohn im Zeitpunkt der Zahlung

Mots-clés

constitutional complaintnon-entrytaxable wagesemployer contributionpublic pension fund

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the constitutional complaint was to be admitted for decision.

Solution extraite

The complaint was not accepted for decision.

Motifs extraits

The chamber decided under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG without a reasoned decision; no admissibility or merits review was pursued in the published text.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.