L'espace de travail IA pour les professionnels du droit

  • Recherche juridique avec accès à plus d'1 million de sources
  • Automatisation de documents
  • Gestion des dossiers
  • Hébergé dans l'UE et en Suisse

Essai gratuit de 14 jours (10 questions/jour pendant l'essai)

Essai gratuitVoir une démo

Constitutional complaint inadmissible without valid power of attorney

BVerfG 2 BvR 2446/14Bverfg / 2. Senat 2. Kammer24 oct. 2014Inadmissible

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court did not admit the constitutional complaint because the power of attorney granted merely “for constitutional complaint” did not expressly refer to the specific proceedings as required by Section 22(2) sentence 2 BVerfGG. As a consequence, the application for interim relief was moot. The decision is final and not subject to appeal.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 22 Abs. 2 S. 2 BVerfGG; admissibility of constitutional complaints depends on an express authorization referring to the конкретe proceedings. A merely general power of attorney “for constitutional complaint” does not satisfy the statutory form requirement if it does not identify the pending procedure in a specific manner. Failure to comply with this requirement renders the constitutional complaint inadmissible and prevents the Court from entering into the merits; ancillary requests for interim relief fall away with the non-admission decision.

Texte intégral

BVerfG — 2 BvR 2446/14, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-10-24

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 2446/14

Dokumenttyp: Nichtannahmebeschluss

Normen: § 22 Abs 2 S 2 BVerfGG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OLG Düsseldorf, 1. September 2014, Az: III-1 Ws 357/14, Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss: Mangels wirksamer Vollmacht unzulässige Verfassungsbeschwerde

Gründe

1 Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, da sich die allgemein "wegen Verfassungsbeschwerde" erteilte Vollmacht nicht gemäß § 22 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG ausdrücklich auf das Verfahren bezieht (vgl. BVerfGE 62, 194 <200>; Beschluss der 3. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 14. November 2001 - 2 BvR 1898/01 -, NJW 2002, S. 428; Lenz/Hansel, BVerfGG, 1. Aufl. 2013, § 22 Rn. 17).

2 Damit erledigt sich der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung.

3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.

Mots-clés

constitutional complaintpower of attorneyadmissibilityinterim reliefformal requirement

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite the power of attorney not expressly referring to the procedure.

Solution extraite

No. A general authorization “for constitutional complaint” is insufficient under Section 22(2) sentence 2 BVerfGG unless it expressly relates to the specific proceedings.

Motifs extraits

The authorization did not expressly identify the present constitutional complaint proceedings, so the formal requirement for representation was not met.

Question juridique clé

Whether the request for interim relief could still be decided.

Solution extraite

No. Once the constitutional complaint was not admitted, the request for an interim injunction was rendered moot.

Motifs extraits

The interim measure depended on the pending constitutional complaint; after non-admission there was no basis for separate adjudication.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.