USA v. Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez

12-12411Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit8 févr. 2013

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12411
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60293-DMM-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RANDERSON RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(February 8, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael G. Smith, appointed counsel for Randerson Rodriguez-Rodriguez,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
Case: 12-12411 Date Filed: 02/08/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Rodriguez-Rodriguez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-12411 Date Filed: 02/08/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.