USA v. Gladys Rivera

12-12703Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit3 déc. 2012

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12703
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00076-GAP-DAB-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GLADYS RIVERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
___________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
____________________________
(December 3, 2012)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN, and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Gladys Rivera in this direct criminal
appeal, has filed both a motion to withdraw from further representation of Ms. Rivera
Case: 12-12703 Date Filed: 12/03/2012 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ms. Rivera has not
objected to the Anders brief filed by Mr. Taylor, and our independent review of the
entire record reveals that Mr. Taylor’s assessment of the relative merit of Ms.
Rivera’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, Mr. Taylor’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Ms. Rivera’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 12-12703 Date Filed: 12/03/2012 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.