Texte intégral
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
————————————
No. 12-13155
————————————
D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00092-MEF-CSC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JERRY JAMES DUMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
————————————
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
————————————
(March 21, 2013)
Before WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
* Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by
designation.
Case: 12-13155 Date Filed: 03/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
In this appeal, Jerry James Dumas challenges the district court’s denial of his
motion to suppress evidence gathered and statements Dumas made when, in an
effort to identify fugitives, officers stopped the car Dumas occupied. Dumas
argues on appeal, as he did before the district court, that the officers who arrested
him lacked reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop, as required by
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968).
After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and having the benefit of oral
argument, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion to
suppress.
AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-13155 Date Filed: 03/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
