Bobbie N. Hill, et al v. William Randy Clark

13-10200Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit9 oct. 2013

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10200
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cv-00260-WCO
BOBBIE N. HILL,
LARRY GAGE,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
WILLIAM RANDY CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 9, 2013)
Before HULL, JORDAN, and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-10200 Date Filed: 10/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Randal Clark appeals the denial of his motion for attorneys’ fees,
which he filed a year and a day after the plaintiffs herein filed their notice of
voluntary dismissal of this action. In a 34-page opinion in which he recounted the
facts of this case with which he was personally and thoroughly familiar, Judge
O’Kelley denied the motion as untimely. In his opinion, Judge O’Kelley
considered and rejected every possible legal theory under which Clark might be
entitled to recover such fees. We can find nothing to add to this careful
examination of Clark’s motion. Accordingly, the decision of the district court
denying Clark’s motion for attorneys’ fees is hereby
AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-10200 Date Filed: 10/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.