USA v. Orlando Ismael Muniz

13-12352Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit24 févr. 2014

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12352
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00006-ACC-TBS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORLANDO ISMAEL MUNIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 24, 2014)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-12352 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Joseph R. Johnson, appointed counsel for Orlando Muniz, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Muniz’s conviction and sentence are AFFRIMED.
Case: 13-12352 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.