Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15438
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cv-00668-MEF-CSC
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,
versus
ALABAMA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Defendant-Counter Plaintiff-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
________________________
(November 24, 2014)
Before HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and TOTENBERG,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
*
Honorable Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge for the Northern District of
Georgia, sitting by designation.
Case: 13-15438 Date Filed: 11/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
In this declaratory judgment action, defendant Alabama Municipal Insurance
Corporation (“AMIC”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company in the amount of
$1,212,714.73, which included the judgment, costs, interest, and attorneys’ fees in
the district court. Defendant AMIC also appeals the district court’s judgment in
favor of Scottsdale on AMIC’s counterclaim for breach of Scottsdale’s enhanced
duty of good faith. After careful review of the record and briefs, and with the
benefit of the oral argument, we find no reversible error and affirm the district
court’s judgment. This Court also remands the case to the district court for the
district court to determine both entitlement and the amount of attorney’s fees for
plaintiff Scottsdale regarding this appeal.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case: 13-15438 Date Filed: 11/24/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --