USA v. Christopher L. Haley

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14076
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00004-BAE-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER L. HALEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 22, 2015)
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew K. Hube, appointed counsel for Christopher L. Haley in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Haley requests the
appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance. Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Haley’s pro
se motion for appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance is DENIED,
and the judgment revoking Haley’s supervised release and his resulting sentence
are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --