Texte intégral
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10018
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00057-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM E. JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(August 11, 2015)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for William E. Jackson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
Case: 15-10018 Date Filed: 08/11/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-10018 Date Filed: 08/11/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
