USA v. Terrance Reid

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13054
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00465-ODE-ECS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRANCE REID,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 29, 2016)
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Terrance Reid appeals his 13-month sentence, imposed for violating his
supervised release by possessing and using controlled substances. The district
court committed no procedural error by discussing treatment options available to
Reid before imposing the sentence: the court, as a matter of law, was required to
impose some imprisonment; and nothing in the record indicates that rehabilitation
(for example, by means of some course of treatment) was a reason for the length of
the sentence. To the extent that Reid faults the court simply for discussing
rehabilitation and treatment options at sentencing, the doctrine of invited error
precludes his argument on appeal: Reid’s counsel introduced the topic at the
hearing. Moreover, for the court to discuss rehabilitation at sentencing is not error.
See United States v. Vandergrift, 754 F.3d 1303, 1311 (11th Cir. 2014).
AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-13054 Date Filed: 02/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --