USA v. Stephannie N. Macnew

20-12317Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit3 mars 2021

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-12317
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:19-cr-00089-TKW-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEPHANNIE N. MACNEW,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(March 3, 2021)
Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-12317 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Sheryl Lowenthal, counsel for Stephannie MacNew in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and MacNew’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-12317 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.