USA v. Damien Madison

21-11626Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit9 déc. 2021

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-11626
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAMIEN MADISON,
a.k.a. Pit,
a.k.a. Slick,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00145-TWT-JKL-36
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11626 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11626
Before WILSON, R OSENBAUM , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Jones, appointed counsel for Damien Madison in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED. Madison’s motion for appointment of new coun-
sel is DENIED as moot.
USCA11 Case: 21-11626 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.