USA v. Alexander X. Evans

21-12463Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit15 févr. 2022

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-12463
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALEXANDER X. EVANS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:19-cr-00089-TKW-4
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12463 Date Filed: 02/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-12463
Before JILL PRYOR, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John A. Terrezza, appointed counsel for Alexander X. Evans
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Evans’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-12463 Date Filed: 02/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.