USA v. Clarence Eugene Robinson

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10282
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLARENCE EUGENE ROBINSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00205-TJC-JK-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10282 Date Filed: 06/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10282
Before JILL PRYOR, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adam Labonte, appointed counsel for Clarence Robinson in
this appeal from the denial of his motion for compassionate release
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as modified by § 603(b) of the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (“First Step Act”),
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appel-
lant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.1
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the denial of Robinson’s motion is AFFIRMED.
1 We decline counsel’s invitation to adopt the position of other Circuit Courts
of Appeals regarding the applicability of
Anders to the denial of motions under
the First Step Act.
USCA11 Case: 22-10282 Date Filed: 06/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --