USA v. Clarence Brenson

22-11680Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16 déc. 2022

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11680
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLARENCE BRENSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00203-JB-B-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11680
Before WILSON, NEWSOM , and G RANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Clarence Brenson in
his appeal from the revocation of his supervised release, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s as-
sessment of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina-
tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, coun-
sel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brenson’s revocation
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.