USA v. Akohomen Ighedoise

23-10270Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit29 janv. 2024

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-10270
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-10270
Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen
Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment
of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.1
1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma
pauperis are DENIED.
USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.