Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-13999
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
COCA-COLA COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-01241-TWT
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-13999 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-13999
Before R OSENBAUM , BRANCH, and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC (“RCDI”)
appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in fa-
vor of Coca-Cola Company and the court’s order denying its mo-
tion for reconsideration. RCDI’s amended complaint asserted a
single claim for patent infringement arising under the patent laws
of the United States, and its notice of appeal specified that it was
appealing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The
district court transmitted the notice of appeal to both courts of ap-
peals. Because the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over
appeals from a final decision of a district court in any civil action
arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, we lack juris-
diction to review the district court’s judgment and its order deny-
ing reconsideration. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); Gunn v. Minton, 568
U.S. 251, 257 (2013); Holmes Grp., Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulations
Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826, 830 (2002).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 23-13999 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 01/09/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --