Jozadaque Rodrigues da Silva, et al v. U.S. Attorney General

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-10517
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
JOZADAQUE RODRIGUES DA SILVA,
SIMONE LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA,
JULIA RHAYALLA LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA,
RHARYSSON PABLO LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA,
Petitioners,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10517
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Agency No. A098-713-850
____________________
Before J ILL PRYOR , B RANCH, and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Petitioners Jozadaque Rodrigues Da Silva and Simone Lopes
Rodrigues Da Silva, proceeding pro se and on behalf of their minor
children, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ De-
cember 8, 2023 decision. That decision dismissed their appeal from
the immigration judge’s order denying their applications for asy-
lum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or De-
grading Treatment or Punishment.
The statutory time limit required petitioners to file a peti-
tion for review on or before January 8, 2024, which was the first
business day following 30 days after the December 8, 2023 decision.
See INA § 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Fed. R. App. P. 15(a)(1),
26(a)(1)(C); Chao Lin v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 677 F.3d 1043, 1045-46 (11th
Cir. 2012) (noting that the statutory time limit is mandatory, juris-
dictional, and not subject to equitable tolling). However, Petition-
ers did not file their petition until February 21, 2024. We therefore
lack jurisdiction to review it.
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack
of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No
USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

24-10517 Opinion of the Court 3
petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the tim-
ing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other appli-
cable rules.
USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --