Robert James Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al

24-10859Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit29 avr. 2024

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-10859
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE,
NURSE ELLIS,
Head Nurse,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
USCA11 Case: 24-10859 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10859
D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cv-00851-ECM-JTA
____________________
Before R OSENBAUM , LUCK , and BRASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. Robert Crenshaw, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals
the district court’s January 11, 2024, final order and judgment. The
statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or
before February 12, 2024, the Monday following 30 days from the
entry of judgment on January 11, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a);
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, he did not file the
instant notice of appeal until March 12, 2024, and thus, it cannot
invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United
States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Hamer v. Neighborhood
Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017).1
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
1 Prior to the instant notice of appeal, Crenshaw filed two timely notices of
appeal, resulting in appeal Nos. 24‑10250 and 24‑10338.
USCA11 Case: 24-10859 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.