Shenisa Mohammed v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On Petition for Review of an Order…

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 23-2219
_______________
SHENISA MOHAMMED,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
_______________
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration
(BIA 1: A089-149-340)
Immigration Judge: Brian T. Palmer
_______________
Argued
March 5, 2024
Before: JORDAN, PORTER, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges
(Filed: July 25, 2024)
_______________
Michael S. Henry [ARGUED]
Henry & Grogan
100 S. Broad Street – Ste. 1605
Philadelphia, PA 19110
Counsel for Petitioner

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Jaclyn G. Hagner [ARGUED]
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation
P.O. Box 878
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Counsel for Respondent
_______________
OPINION
_______________
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
Shenisa Mohammed received a Notice to Appear (“NTA”) in the Immigration
Court in Cleveland, Ohio, and the NTA was filed and docketed in that Court. Following
a hearing, which Mohammed attended virtually from the Moshannon Valley Correctional
Center in Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, where she was detained, and the Immigration Judge
(“IJ”) conducted virtually while physically present in Virginia, the IJ ordered that
Mohammed be removed from the country.
For the reasons discussed in Castillo v. Attorney General of the United States,
Case Nos. 23-2123, 23-2800, & 23-3136, we hold that judicial venue under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(2) lies in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Accordingly, we will transfer Shenisa Mohammed’s petition to the Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit.
 This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and, pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7,
does not constitute binding precedent.

-- 2 of 2 --