John G. Singletary, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, its employees to include agents individually

13-1771Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 oct. 2013

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1771
JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, its employees to
include agents individually and collectively to include
David Bates,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00484-RMG)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John G. Singletary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lydia Blessing
Applegate, Stafford J. McQuillin, III, William Howell Morrison,
John H. Tiller, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Charleston,
South Carolina; Hamlet Sam Mabry, III, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER &
BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John G. Singletary, Jr., appeals from the district
court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the
order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Wachovia
Mortgage Corporation in his civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Singletary v. Wells
Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corp., No. 2:11-cv-00484-RMG (D.S.C. May
16, 2013). We deny Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.