Texte intégral
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6135
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BARRINGTON ISAACS, a/k/a Orville Griswold,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:98-cr-00356-DCN-3)
Submitted: May 20, 2014 Decided: May 23, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barrington Isaacs, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Peter Thomas
Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Barrington Isaacs appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and denying his
motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Isaacs, No. 2:98-cr-00356-DCN-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2013 & Jan. 8,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
