Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch

15-2323Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31 mars 2016

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2323
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00215-BO)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wilder’s informal brief
does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, Wilder has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Wilder’s motions to appoint
counsel and for a change of venue and affirm the district
court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.