David Crawley v. George M. Hinkle; Gregory Holloway; W. R. Hensley; M. B. Sturgill; S. T. Isbell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7511
DAVID CRAWLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE M. HINKLE; GREGORY HOLLOWAY; W. R. HENSLEY; M. B.
STURGILL; S. T. ISBELL,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Edward Crawley, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Edward Crawley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Crawley v. Hinkle, No. 7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 25,
2015). We deny Crawley’s motion for appointment of counsel and
we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --