Larry Felentise Rambert v. Heather Rose

16-7614Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 juin 2017

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7614
LARRY FELENTISE RAMBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HEATHER ROSE; CITY OF JACKSONVILLE; JACKSONVILLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; JOHN ERVIN; DETECTIVE JORDAN; JEFF COVINGTON;
CRYSTAL CATON; CHRIS COX; SERGEANT CAPPS; JOSEPH COOPER;
SHELLY PARTIAN; K. L. DOYLE; RONNIE DORN; DALE SILANCE;
RICHARD KELLUM; H. T. RANEY; TIMOTHY OSWALT, Attorney; SAMUEL
S. POPKIN; FRANK L. PERRY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03316-BO)
Submitted: May 31, 2017 Decided: June 12, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Felentise Rambert, Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Larry Felentise Rambert appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Rambert v. Rose, No. 5:15-ct-03316-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.