Texte intégral
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-266
MR. CASEY LUCZAK,
Petitioner,
v.
MR. JOE COAKLEY, Warden,
Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:16-cv-00189-FPS-JES)
Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Luczak, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Casey Luczak has filed a petition for permission to appeal, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to appoint counsel. We construe
Luczak’s petition as a petition for a writ of mandamus. We find the present record does
not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny Luczak’s petition and
deny his motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
