Charles Alonzo Tunstall v. Frank L. Perry

18-6285Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 août 2018

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6285
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, RN; DR. SAMI HASSAN; JANE
WELCH, Head Nurse; MS. PADGEANT; LETITIA OWENS; CAPTAIN
BROCKINGTON; MS. FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DR. CHARLES STEWART; PETER WOGLOM; DR ARTHUR DAVIS; DR.
SAMUEL MICKLOS; DR. KEYSER; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No.
1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016; June 22, 2017; Jan. 5, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.