In re: Blake Sandlain

21-1672Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21 oct. 2021

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1672
In re: BLAKE SANDLAIN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:20-cv-00790)
Submitted: October 19, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Blake Sandlain, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Blake Sandlain filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a supplemental petition
for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion for mandamus relief. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court
to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that on September 23, 2021, the
district court denied Sandlain’s motion for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Sandlain’s case, we deny the mandamus petitions as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.