Texte intégral
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2168
FELICIA A. UNDERDUE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00653-RJC)
Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 18, 2023
Before HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felicia A. Underdue, Appellant Pro Se. Tory Ian Summey, Keith Michael Weddington,
PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Felicia A. Underdue appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
in favor of her former employer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., on her second amended
complaint alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 12101 to 12213. She also appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave
to amend in part. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s orders.∗ Underdue v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:16-cv-
00653-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2019 & Oct. 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ In her informal brief, Underdue purports to challenge all of the district court’s
orders. After reviewing her brief, we conclude that Underdue’s complaints about the
district court’s handling of the discovery in her case are without merit. Moreover, to the
extent that Underdue seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for a
preliminary injunction, she may not do so because we have already affirmed the district
court’s denial of that motion. See Underdue v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 837 F. App’x 239
(4th Cir. 2021) (No. 20-1956).
-- 2 of 2 --