Nathaniel Cannon v. Charter Communications

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1076
NATHANIEL CANNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00657-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: June 30, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Bader, Raleigh, North Carolina,
Patrick Houghton Flanagan, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Catrina Celeste Creswell, KABAT, CHAPMAN & OZMER, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Cannon appeals from the district court’s final judgment entered upon a
jury verdict in favor of Charter Communications on Cannon’s failure-to-accommodate
claim, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to
12213. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the trial proceedings. An
appellant has the burden of including in the record a transcript of all parts of the
proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10; 4th Cir. R. 10.
Upon application, an appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to
transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). By
failing to produce a transcript or to apply for the production of a transcript at government
expense, Cannon has waived review of the issues raised on appeal that depend on the
transcript to establish error. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Keller v. Prince George’s Cnty., 827
F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987).
We have reviewed the record before us and found no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --