Starsha M. Sewell, a/k/a Evelina M v. Alejandro Mayorkas

22-1330Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 oct. 2022

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1330
STARSHA M. SEWELL, a/k/a Evelina M,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (8:21-cv-00126-LKG)
Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Sewell’s pro se employment discrimination action. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Sewell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s
disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the appealed-from order. See Jackson v.
Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document;
under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.