Elizabeth Castro-De Garcia; A.e.g.c.; Mauro Garcia-Torres v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1540
ELIZABETH CASTRO-DE GARCIA; A.E.G.C.; MAURO GARCIA-TORRES,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 14, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Andrew Barreto, GOREN & BARRETO, Silver Spring, Maryland, for
Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J.
Flynn, Assistant Director, Jessica R. Lesnau, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil
Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Castro-De Garcia, Mauro Garcia-Torres, and their minor child, natives
and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of their
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence
does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v.
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Castro-De Garcia (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2022). We
deny the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --