Brandace Jarreau Rosevelt:hopper v. State of North Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1846
BRANDACE JARREAU ROSEVELT:HOPPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; LAWRENCE W. BLAKE, d/b/a Substitute Trustee
Services, Inc.; HUTCHENS LAW FIRM; FRANK D. WHITNEY; HILTON TERRY
HUTCHENS, JR.; ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC; ELISA CHINN-GARY; DONALD C.
COGGINS, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (3:22-cv-00259-DCC-KFM)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandace Jarreau Rosevelt:Hopper, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Allen Bunda, HUTCHENS
LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Brandace Jarreau Rosevelt:Hopper seeks to appeal the orders issued in his pending
civil action denying his motions for recusal of the district court and magistrate judges and
denying his request for reconsideration of the orders denying recusal. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Rosevelt:Hopper seeks to appeal are
neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --